Naposki v. McAllister Lighterage Line, Inc.

232 A.D. 802

This text of 232 A.D. 802 (Naposki v. McAllister Lighterage Line, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Naposki v. McAllister Lighterage Line, Inc., 232 A.D. 802 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present -—■ Finch, Merrell, Martin, O’Malley and Sherman, JJ.; O’Malley, J., dissents and votes for reversal and a new trial on the ground that the question of control of the derrick barge at the time and place of the accident should have been submitted to the jury. (See Bartolomeo v. Bennett Contracting Co., 245 N. Y. 66.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bartolomeo v. Charles Bennett Contracting Co.
156 N.E. 98 (New York Court of Appeals, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
232 A.D. 802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/naposki-v-mcallister-lighterage-line-inc-nyappdiv-1931.