Napolitano v. New York State Grievance Committee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Napolitano v. New York State Grievance Committee

33 A.D.3d 979, 822 N.Y.S.2d 712

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 31, 2006

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 33 A.D.3d 979 (Napolitano v. New York State Grievance Committee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Napolitano v. New York State Grievance Committee, 33 A.D.3d 979, 822 N.Y.S.2d 712 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

In a claim to recover damages related to a disciplinary proceeding instituted by the Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, the claimant appeals from an order of the Court of Claims (Scuccimarra, J.), dated May 6, 2005, which, inter alia, granted the motion of the defendant State of New York to dismiss the claim.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs to the respondent State of New York.

The Court of Claims properly found that the claim was time-barred, as any alleged wrong occurred at the date of the claimant’s suspension in May 2001 (see Court of Claims Act [980]*980§ 10 [3]; CPLR 214), and further that the claimant failed to adequately describe the nature of his claim (see Court of Claims Act § 11 [b]).

The claimant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.P, Schmidt, Krausman and Lifson, JJ., concur. [See 8 Misc 3d 1007(A), 2005 NY Slip Op 50982(U) (2005).]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a claim to recover damages related to a disciplinary proceeding instituted by the Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, the claimant appeals from an order of the Court of Claims (Scuccimarra, J.), dated May 6, 2005, which, inter alia, granted the motion of the defendant State of New York to dismiss the claim.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs to the respondent State of New York.

The Court of Claims properly found that the claim was time-barred, as any alleged wrong occurred at the date of the claimant’s suspension in May 2001 (see Court of Claims Act [980]*980§ 10 [3]; CPLR 214), and further that the claimant failed to adequately describe the nature of his claim (see Court of Claims Act § 11 [b]).

The claimant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.P, Schmidt, Krausman and Lifson, JJ., concur. [See 8 Misc 3d 1007(A), 2005 NY Slip Op 50982(U) (2005).]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 A.D.3d 979, 822 N.Y.S.2d 712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/napolitano-v-new-york-state-grievance-committee-nyappdiv-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack