Napoli ex rel. United Bonding Insurance Co. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Napoli ex rel. United Bonding Insurance Co. v. State

248 So. 2d 502, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6526

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 25, 1971

DocketNo. M-358

StatusPublished

This text of 248 So. 2d 502 (Napoli ex rel. United Bonding Insurance Co. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Napoli ex rel. United Bonding Insurance Co. v. State, 248 So. 2d 502, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6526 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

RAWLS, Judge.

This cause involves the same basic factual issues as outlined in this Court’s opinion in United Bonding Insurance Company v. State, 242 So.2d 140 (Fla.App. 1st 1970), wherein we reversed and remanded that cause to the trial court for further proceedings.

A distinguishing question raised in the instant appeal is that appellant, John M. Napoli, has not demonstrated any interest in the subject matter or that he is a legal representative for United Bonding Insurance Company. Without passing upon the status of appellant, Napoli, we remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings in accordance with the opinion rendered in United Bonding Insurance Company v. State, supra.

Reversed and remanded.

JOHNSON, C. J., and SPECTOR, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI