Napoleon v. McCullough
99 A. 385, 89 N.J.L. 716, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 384
This text of 99 A. 385 (Napoleon v. McCullough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Napoleon v. McCullough, 99 A. 385, 89 N.J.L. 716, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 384 (N.J. 1916).
Opinion
The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Tkenchard, Bergen, Black, "White, HepPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, JJ. 10.
For reversal—ISTone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Parr v. New Mexico State Highway Department
215 P.2d 602 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1950)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
99 A. 385, 89 N.J.L. 716, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/napoleon-v-mccullough-nj-1916.