Napoleon v. McCullough
99 A. 385, 89 N.J.L. 716, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 384
Opinion
The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Tkenchard, Bergen, Black, "White, HepPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, JJ. 10.
For reversal—ISTone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Napoleon v. McCullough, 99 A. 385, 89 N.J.L. 716, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 384 (N.J. 1916).
99 A. 385 (Napoleon v. McCullough) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Parr v. New Mexico State Highway Department
215 P.2d 602 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1950)