Naples v. Maxwell

176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 443
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1964
DocketNo. 38849
StatusPublished

This text of 176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 443 (Naples v. Maxwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Naples v. Maxwell, 176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 443 (Ohio 1964).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner bases his right to release on the ground that he was convicted on evidence procured by an illegal search. He contends that the search was illegal on the basis that the search warrant was not based upon legally sufficient probable cause.

As shown above, petitioner appealed to this court from his conviction. This court will take judicial notice of the record of a case previously before it involving the same subject matter. Hughes v. County Board of Revision of Butler County, 143 Ohio St., 559. An examination of the assignments of error in cases No. 38471 and No. 38472 (State v. Naples, 175 Ohio St., 550) reveals that petitioner raised the same issue in that case as the one raised in the present case.

An accused cannot by way of habeas corpus obtain a second review of an issue he previously properly raised on appeal. Ex [444]*444parte Stringer, 171 Ohio St., 400; and Graff v. Green, Supt., 172 Ohio St., 294.

Petitioner having previously raised the same issue on appeal, the relief is denied.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hughes v. County Board of Revision
56 N.E.2d 63 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/naples-v-maxwell-ohio-1964.