Naples Fruit & Vegetable Co. v. Townsend

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Naples Fruit & Vegetable Co. v. Townsend

320 So. 2d 42, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15403

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 19, 1975

DocketNo. 74-1394

StatusPublished

This text of 320 So. 2d 42 (Naples Fruit & Vegetable Co. v. Townsend) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Naples Fruit & Vegetable Co. v. Townsend, 320 So. 2d 42, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15403 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

BOARDMAN, Judge.

This is appellant’s/defendant’s second appeal, following the second trial of this cause, which was held pursuant to our remand for a new trial (Naples Fruit & Vegetable Co. v. Townsend, Fla.App.2d, 1973, 276 So.2d 222, cert. den. Fla. 1973, 281 So.2d 214). In the prior trial, final judgment was entered in favor of appellee/plaintiff, awarding him damages in the amount of $9,915.56. On remand, the parties stipulated to rely on the same testimony that had been offered by them in the prior trial. In due course, the trial court entered final judgment in favor of appellee and against the appellant in the amount of $9,919.56.

The material facts are set out in our prior opinion and we see no reason to recite them here. We have heard oral argument, reviewed the record and given full consideration to the applicable law set out in the briefs filed by the parties and hold that there is substantial competent evidence in the record to support the ruling of the trial court. It should be left undisturbed.

We, therefore, overrule our decision rendered in the prior appeal. In view of the fact that the trial court’s ruling in said case was neither contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence, nor clearly erroneous, it was inappropriate for this court to have substituted its judgment for the judgment of the trial court. Affirmed.

McNULTY, C. j., and SCHWARTZ, ALAN R., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BOARDMAN, Judge.

This is appellant’s/defendant’s second appeal, following the second trial of this cause, which was held pursuant to our remand for a new trial (Naples Fruit & Vegetable Co. v. Townsend, Fla.App.2d, 1973, 276 So.2d 222, cert. den. Fla. 1973, 281 So.2d 214). In the prior trial, final judgment was entered in favor of appellee/plaintiff, awarding him damages in the amount of $9,915.56. On remand, the parties stipulated to rely on the same testimony that had been offered by them in the prior trial. In due course, the trial court entered final judgment in favor of appellee and against the appellant in the amount of $9,919.56.

The material facts are set out in our prior opinion and we see no reason to recite them here. We have heard oral argument, reviewed the record and given full consideration to the applicable law set out in the briefs filed by the parties and hold that there is substantial competent evidence in the record to support the ruling of the trial court. It should be left undisturbed.

We, therefore, overrule our decision rendered in the prior appeal. In view of the fact that the trial court’s ruling in said case was neither contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence, nor clearly erroneous, it was inappropriate for this court to have substituted its judgment for the judgment of the trial court. Affirmed.

McNULTY, C. j., and SCHWARTZ, ALAN R., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

320 So. 2d 42, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/naples-fruit-vegetable-co-v-townsend-fladistctapp-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack