Napier v. State Comptroller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Napier v. State Comptroller

211 A.D.2d 941, 621 N.Y.S.2d 945, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 249

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 12, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 211 A.D.2d 941 (Napier v. State Comptroller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Napier v. State Comptroller, 211 A.D.2d 941, 621 N.Y.S.2d 945, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 249 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which denied petitioner’s application for accidental disability retirement benefits.

Upon review of the record, we conclude that there is substantial evidence to support the determination denying petitioner’s application for accidental disability retirement benefits. There is a rational basis for concluding that an incident happening on April 12, 1990, when petitioner fell down some stairs where she worked as a Senior Youth Division Counselor, occurred because of petitioner’s own misstep and, conse[942]*942quently, this incident did not constitute an accident as that term is defined by statute. Petitioner’s remaining arguments have been examined and found unpersuasive.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which denied petitioner’s application for accidental disability retirement benefits.

Upon review of the record, we conclude that there is substantial evidence to support the determination denying petitioner’s application for accidental disability retirement benefits. There is a rational basis for concluding that an incident happening on April 12, 1990, when petitioner fell down some stairs where she worked as a Senior Youth Division Counselor, occurred because of petitioner’s own misstep and, conse[942]*942quently, this incident did not constitute an accident as that term is defined by statute. Petitioner’s remaining arguments have been examined and found unpersuasive.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

211 A.D.2d 941, 621 N.Y.S.2d 945, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/napier-v-state-comptroller-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack