Napier v. State

338 So. 2d 463, 1976 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1764
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided October 12, 1976·No. 1 Div. 693·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a conviction of possession of a variety of controlled substances. The general issue on Count 1 (quaalude), Count 3 (morphine sulfate), Count 4 (pantapon), and Count 5 (methamphetamine) resulted in a general verdict of guilty with a fine of $25,000. The trial judge sentenced Napier to five years penitentiary punishment.

The only two adverse rulings worthy of comment are correct under Brantley, 294 Ala. 344, 317 So.2d 345 (multiplicity of drugs in evidence) and Cassell, 55 Ala.App. 502, 317 So.2d 348 (non legislative ascribing methaquaalude to controlled substance list ex post facto by the non-elected State Board of Health).

Hence, the judgment below is

AFFIRMED.

TYSON, HARRIS, DeCARLO and BOOKOUT, JJ., concur. CATES, P. J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Napier v. State, 338 So. 2d 463, 1976 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1764 (Ala. Ct. App. 1976).

338 So. 2d 463 (Napier v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reed v. State
401 So. 2d 131 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1981)
McCurley v. State
390 So. 2d 15 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1980)
Isbell v. State
390 So. 2d 308 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1980)
Williford v. State
365 So. 2d 1257 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1978)
Flippo v. State
359 So. 2d 1184 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1978)