Napier v. Napier

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Napier v. Napier

518 So. 2d 148, 1987 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 1437, 1987 WL 938

CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama

DecidedOctober 14, 1987

DocketCiv. 5969

StatusPublished

This text of 518 So. 2d 148 (Napier v. Napier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Napier v. Napier, 518 So. 2d 148, 1987 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 1437, 1987 WL 938 (Ala. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant (wife) apparently sought relief via Rule 60(b), Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure, from a judgment of divorce. The divorce decree was entered some three years prior to the appellant’s Rule 60(b) motion.

The appellant, who appeals pro se, has failed to substantially comply with Rule 28, Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure. This court has no alternative but to affirm. Melton v. Jackson, 284 Ala. 253, 224 So.2d 611 (1969); 2A Ala.Digest, Appeal & Error, Key No. 758.1 (1982).

AFFIRMED.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI