Napier v. Lipman

22 S.C.L. 295
CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedFebruary 20, 1837
StatusPublished

This text of 22 S.C.L. 295 (Napier v. Lipman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Napier v. Lipman, 22 S.C.L. 295 (S.C. Ct. App. 1837).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Evans

delivered the opinion of the court.

The only ground argued and insisted on, in this court, is, that the order should not have been granted, but on the condition of paying costs. This is the usual term upon which such orders are made, and if it had been brought to my view, at the Circuit Court, would have been annexed to the order. The order is also defective, in not specifying the nature of the new plea. It must be an issuable ploa. The order of the Circuit Court is therefore amended, so as to read as follows : It is ordered, that the defendant have leave to withdraw his pleas, heretofore pleaded, and that he have' leave to plead a new issuable plea, on paying the costs of this amendment.

JOSÍAH J. EVANS.

We concur,

RICHARD GANTT, 3. B. O’NEALL, J. S. RICHARDSON, Á. B. BUTLER,-.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 S.C.L. 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/napier-v-lipman-scctapp-1837.