Napier v. F

First Circuit

Napier v. F

454 F.3d 61

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedAugust 18, 2006

Docket05-1503

StatusPublished

This text of 454 F.3d 61 (Napier v. F) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Napier v. F, 454 F.3d 61 (1st Cir. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

Nos. 05-1503, 05-2545

JAMES NAPIER,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

F/V DEESIE, INC.,

Defendant, Appellee.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on July 11, 2006, is amended as follows:

On page 6 of the slip opinion, the sentence beginning "The magistrate judge's ruling was also erroneous..." should now read as follows:

The magistrate judge's ruling was also erroneous because Napier, in a report that was filed with his opposition to Deesie's amended motion for summary judgment, provided evidence that he took aspirin and Motrin, an allegation that should have been taken as true by the magistrate judge for purposes of deciding upon the summary judgment motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI