Napier v. Dilday

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Napier v. Dilday

1913 OK 388, 132 P. 1085, 38 Okla. 365, 1913 Okla. LEXIS 376

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 10, 1913

Docket4810

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 1913 OK 388 (Napier v. Dilday) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Napier v. Dilday, 1913 OK 388, 132 P. 1085, 38 Okla. 365, 1913 Okla. LEXIS 376 (Okla. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

WILLIAMS, J.

The record shows that the finding made against the plaintiffs in error, upon which the judgment was rendered, was with the consent of their counsel. Consent ends all contention between the parties,- and there is nothing to- review on appeal. Baker v. Van Ness et al., 37 Okla. 122, 130 Pac. 536; Schmidt v. Oregon Gold Mining Co., 28 Ore. 9, 40 Pac. 406, 1014, 52 Am. St. Rep. 759, and authorities therein cited. ■

The proceeding in error is dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WILLIAMS, J.

The record shows that the finding made against the plaintiffs in error, upon which the judgment was rendered, was with the consent of their counsel. Consent ends all contention between the parties,- and there is nothing to- review on appeal. Baker v. Van Ness et al., 37 Okla. 122, 130 Pac. 536; Schmidt v. Oregon Gold Mining Co., 28 Ore. 9, 40 Pac. 406, 1014, 52 Am. St. Rep. 759, and authorities therein cited. ■

The proceeding in error is dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1913 OK 388, 132 P. 1085, 38 Okla. 365, 1913 Okla. LEXIS 376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/napier-v-dilday-okla-1913.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack