Napier v. Dasher

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Napier v. Dasher

76 S.E. 1062, 12 Ga. App. 153, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 472

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 22, 1913·No. 4497·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pottle, J.

No error of law'being complained of, and the evidence not only warranting, but largely preponderating in favor of, the verdict, and this being the only reasonable conclusion which can be reached from the evidence, the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial, based solely upon the ground that the verdict was contrary to law and the evidence, will be affirmed, and the motion of the defendant in error to award damages for frivolous appeal will be sustained.

Judgment affirmed, with damages.

Complaint; from city court of Macon—Judge Hodges. October 15, 1912.

Jesse Harris, for plaintiff in error. W. D. McNeil, A. L. Dasher Jr., contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pottle, J.

No error of law'being complained of, and the evidence not only warranting, but largely preponderating in favor of, the verdict, and this being the only reasonable conclusion which can be reached from the evidence, the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial, based solely upon the ground that the verdict was contrary to law and the evidence, will be affirmed, and the motion of the defendant in error to award damages for frivolous appeal will be sustained.

Judgment affirmed, with damages.

Complaint; from city court of Macon—Judge Hodges. October 15, 1912.

Jesse Harris, for plaintiff in error. W. D. McNeil, A. L. Dasher Jr., contra.

Napier v. Dasher, 76 S.E. 1062, 12 Ga. App. 153, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 472 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

76 S.E. 1062 (Napier v. Dasher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related