Napier v. Dasher

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Napier v. Dasher

76 S.E. 1062, 12 Ga. App. 153, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 472

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 22, 1913

Docket4497

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 76 S.E. 1062 (Napier v. Dasher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Napier v. Dasher, 76 S.E. 1062, 12 Ga. App. 153, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 472 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Pottle, J.

No error of law'being complained of, and the evidence not only warranting, but largely preponderating in favor of, the verdict, and this being the only reasonable conclusion which can be reached from the evidence, the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial, based solely upon the ground that the verdict was contrary to law and the evidence, will be affirmed, and the motion of the defendant in error to award damages for frivolous appeal will be sustained.

Judgment affirmed, with damages.

Complaint; from city court of Macon—Judge Hodges. October 15, 1912.

Jesse Harris, for plaintiff in error. W. D. McNeil, A. L. Dasher Jr., contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI