Naparstek v. Reichbach

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Naparstek v. Reichbach

44 A.D.2d 556, 353 N.Y.S.2d 715, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5572

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 4, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 44 A.D.2d 556 (Naparstek v. Reichbach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Naparstek v. Reichbach, 44 A.D.2d 556, 353 N.Y.S.2d 715, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5572 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to modify a decree of a court of Mexico so as to increase the provision of said decree directing- support for two children of [557]*557the parties to be paid by their father, (1) the petitioning mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated March 28, 1972, as, after a hearing, increased the child support provision from $70 per week to $90 per week and awarded petitioner a counsel fee of $250; and (2) the father cross-appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of the order as thus increased the child support provision. Order modified, on the facts, by increasing the counsel fee award to $500. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. To the extent indicated herein, the counsel fee award was inadequate. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Latham and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to modify a decree of a court of Mexico so as to increase the provision of said decree directing- support for two children of [557]*557the parties to be paid by their father, (1) the petitioning mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated March 28, 1972, as, after a hearing, increased the child support provision from $70 per week to $90 per week and awarded petitioner a counsel fee of $250; and (2) the father cross-appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of the order as thus increased the child support provision. Order modified, on the facts, by increasing the counsel fee award to $500. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. To the extent indicated herein, the counsel fee award was inadequate. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Latham and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

44 A.D.2d 556, 353 N.Y.S.2d 715, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/naparstek-v-reichbach-nyappdiv-1974.