Nantworks, LLC v. Bank Of America Corporation

CourtDistrict Court, C.D. California
DecidedMay 25, 2023
Docket2:20-cv-07872
StatusUnknown

This text of Nantworks, LLC v. Bank Of America Corporation (Nantworks, LLC v. Bank Of America Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nantworks, LLC v. Bank Of America Corporation, (C.D. Cal. 2023).

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NANTWORKS, LLC, a Delaware Case No. 2:20-cv-07872-GW-PVCx 11 limited liability company, and NANT HOLDINGS IP, LLC, a 12 Delaware limited liability company, REVISED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 13 Plaintiffs, 14 vs. 15 BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, a Delaware 16 corporation, and BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., a national banking 17 association, 18 Defendants. 19 20 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 21 22 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production 23 of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from 24 public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation 25 may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to 26 enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order 27 does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that 28 the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited 1 information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal 2 principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in subsection 14.3, below, that 3 this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information 4 under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and 5 the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file 6 material under seal. 7 2. DEFINITIONS 8 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of 9 information or items under this Order. 10 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: all Discovery Material, and all 11 information contained therein, and other information designated as confidential, to the 12 extent that the Party or non-party designating the Discovery Material as confidential in 13 good faith reasonably believes that such Discovery Material contains non-public 14 information, confidential information, trade secrets, proprietary business information, 15 competitively or commercially sensitive information, nonpublic personal information 16 within the meaning of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (15 U.S.C. § 6801) or similar 17 applicable state or local consumer privacy protective laws and/or “consumer reports” 18 within the meaning of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. § 168la) (collectively, 19 the “Acts”), that may be collected or produced in connection with originating, 20 purchasing, or servicing a mortgage loan, or other information, the disclosure of which 21 would, in the good faith judgment of the Producing Party (defined below) be detrimental 22 to the conduct of that Party’s business or the business of any of the Party’s customers 23 or clients. 24 2.3 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House 25 Counsel (as well as their support staff). 26 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or 27 items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL” 28 or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “HIGHLY 1 CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE.” 2 2.5 Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or 3 manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, 4 testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in 5 disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 6 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 7 pertinent to the litigation, as well as their immediate support staff, provided that 8 disclosure is only necessary to perform such work, who (1) has been retained by a Party 9 or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this action, (2) is not a 10 current employee of a Party or of a Party’s competitor,1 and (3) at the time of retention, 11 is not anticipated to become an employee of a Party or of a Party’s competitor. 12 2.7 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” 13 Information or Items: extremely sensitive “Confidential Information or Items,” 14 disclosure of which to another Party or Non-Party would create a substantial risk of 15 serious harm that could not be avoided by less restrictive means. This designation shall 16 signify that (i) at the time of the designation the Discovery Material contains or 17 constitutes trade secrets or confidential business or financial information, (ii) there is a 18 substantial and imminent risk that absent such designation, its receipt by the Receiving 19 Party could cause competitive and/or economic harm to the Producing Party, and (iii) 20 such Discovery Material would not otherwise be adequately protected under the 21 procedures set forth herein for “Confidential Information.” Nothing in this subsection 22 shall preclude counsel from giving advice to his or her client in this litigation that 23 includes a general evaluation of Highly Confidential Information, provided that counsel 24 shall not disclose the contents of any Highly Confidential Information contrary to the 25 terms of this Stipulated Protective Order. 26 2.8 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” Information or Items: 27 1 The Parties retain the right to object to a past employee of a Party or of a Party’s 28 competitor under subsection 7.5. 1 extremely sensitive “Confidential Information or Items” representing computer code 2 and associated comments and revision histories, formulas, engineering specifications, 3 or schematics that define or otherwise describe in detail the algorithms or structure of 4 software or hardware designs, disclosure of which to another Party or Non-Party would 5 create a substantial risk of serious harm that could not be avoided by less restrictive 6 means. 7 2.9 House Counsel: two (2) designated attorneys who are employees of a Party 8 to this action. House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other 9 outside counsel. A Party may, for good cause, replace a designated House Counsel 10 attorney. 11 2.10 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or 12 other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 13 2.11 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to 14 this action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared 15 in this action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared 16 on behalf of that party, as well as staff of such counsel to whom it is reasonably 17 necessary to disclose or allow access to Protected Material for this litigation. 18 2.12 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, 19 employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their 20 support staffs). 21 2.13 Party Representative: two (2) designated representatives of a Party (e.g., 22 officers, directors, and employees) who are required in good faith to provide assistance 23 in the conduct of this litigation, including any settlement discussions. 24 2.14 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Discovery Material in 25 this action, including in depositions, document productions or otherwise, or the Party 26 or non-party asserting the confidentiality of such material, as the case may be. 27 2.15 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support 28 1 services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or 2 demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and 3 their employees and subcontractors.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Nantworks, LLC v. Bank Of America Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nantworks-llc-v-bank-of-america-corporation-cacd-2023.