Nanton v. Grosso

New York Court of Appeals

Nanton v. Grosso

774 N.E.2d 755, 98 N.Y.2d 689, 746 N.Y.S.2d 690, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 1930

DecidedJuly 2, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 774 N.E.2d 755 (Nanton v. Grosso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nanton v. Grosso, 774 N.E.2d 755, 98 N.Y.2d 689, 746 N.Y.S.2d 690, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 1930 (N.Y. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

On the Court’s own motion, appeal, insofar as taken from the Appellate Division order denying the motion to reargue, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; appeal, insofar as taken from the Appellate Division judgment dismissing the CPLR article 78 proceeding, dismissed, without costs, as untimely (see CPLR 5513 [a]). Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying the motion to reargue, dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division judgment dismissing the CPLR article 78 proceeding, dismissed as untimely (see CPLR 5513 [b]). Motion for poor person relief, etc., dismissed as academic.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On the Court’s own motion, appeal, insofar as taken from the Appellate Division order denying the motion to reargue, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; appeal, insofar as taken from the Appellate Division judgment dismissing the CPLR article 78 proceeding, dismissed, without costs, as untimely (see CPLR 5513 [a]). Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying the motion to reargue, dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division judgment dismissing the CPLR article 78 proceeding, dismissed as untimely (see CPLR 5513 [b]). Motion for poor person relief, etc., dismissed as academic.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

774 N.E.2d 755, 98 N.Y.2d 689, 746 N.Y.S.2d 690, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 1930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nanton-v-grosso-ny-2002.