Nandine v. Darrach
2 Del. Cas. 131, 1800 Del. LEXIS 18
This text of 2 Del. Cas. 131 (Nandine v. Darrach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Delaware Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Nandine v. Darrach, 2 Del. Cas. 131, 1800 Del. LEXIS 18 (Del. Super. Ct. 1800).
Opinion
In this action there are three grounds. First, not due diligence. The Court think a demand of payment was necessary. Second, plaintiffs were bound to give notice, — reasonable notice, to be decided by you. Third, plaintiffs had received a part, which discharged the drawer. The Court consider this question to turn on the second point.
Verdict for defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Del. Cas. 131, 1800 Del. LEXIS 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nandine-v-darrach-delctcompl-1800.