Nancy Simenstad v. R. Keith Spencer and Bailey & Galyen
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-11-00491-CV
NANCY SIMENSTAD APPELLANT
V.
R. KEITH SPENCER AND BAILEY & APPELLEES GALYEN
------------
FROM THE 352ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------
We have considered appellant’s “Motion To Dismiss.” It is the court=s
opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See
Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).
Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution
issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. DELIVERED: January 19, 2012
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nancy Simenstad v. R. Keith Spencer and Bailey & Galyen (Nancy Simenstad v. R. Keith Spencer and Bailey & Galyen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.