Nancy Simenstad v. R. Keith Spencer and Bailey & Galyen

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 19, 2012·No. 02-11-00491-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00491-CV

NANCY SIMENSTAD APPELLANT

V.

R. KEITH SPENCER AND BAILEY & APPELLEES GALYEN

------------

FROM THE 352ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

We have considered appellant’s “Motion To Dismiss.” It is the court=s

opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See

Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution

issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. DELIVERED: January 19, 2012

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nancy Simenstad v. R. Keith Spencer and Bailey & Galyen, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Nancy Simenstad v. R. Keith Spencer and Bailey & Galyen (Nancy Simenstad v. R. Keith Spencer and Bailey & Galyen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.