Nancy Latessa v. Michigan Institute of Urology Pc
This text of Nancy Latessa v. Michigan Institute of Urology Pc (Nancy Latessa v. Michigan Institute of Urology Pc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
September 1, 2017 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice
Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack 156070(70) David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen NANCY LATESSA, Kurtis T. Wilder, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices SC: 156070 v COA: 331476 Macomb CC: 14-003645-NH MICHIGAN INSTITUTE OF UROLOGY, P.C., ST. JOHN PROVIDENCE HEALTH SYSTEM, ST. JOHN MACOMB-OAKLAND HOSPITAL, SCOTT SIRCUS, M.D., and GEORGE CHRISTENSEN, D.O., Defendants-Appellees. ______________________________________/
On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the defendants-appellees to extend the time for filing their answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The answer submitted on August 28, 2017, is accepted for filing.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. September 1, 2017
Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Nancy Latessa v. Michigan Institute of Urology Pc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nancy-latessa-v-michigan-institute-of-urology-pc-mich-2017.