Nancy L. Tankersley and Charlie R. Tankersley v. Triple I. Ranches, a Texas Partnership
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-18-00211-CV
Nancy L. TANKERSLEY and Charlie R. Tankersley, Appellants
v.
TRIPLE I. RANCHES, A TEXAS PARTNERSHIP, Appellee
From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas Trial Court No. 13940 Honorable Spencer W. Brown, Judge Presiding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Beth Watkins, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
Delivered and Filed: May 22, 2019
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
Appellants filed a pro se notice of appeal challenging the trial court’s judgment.
Appellants’ brief was originally due September 10, 2018, but the due date was extended after this
court granted a thirty-day extension. On October 10, 2018, appellants filed a notice of bankruptcy,
and this court abated the matter. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.1, 8.2. On March 20, 2019, appellee filed
a motion to reinstate, attaching a certified copy of the bankruptcy court’s order showing the
1 The Honorable N. Keith Williams is the presiding judge of the 216th District Court, Gillespie County, Texas. However, the judgment in this case was signed by the Honorable Spencer W. Brown, sitting by assignment. 04-18-00211-CV
bankruptcy had been dismissed. See id. R. 8.3(a). Accordingly, on March 26, 2017, we rendered
an order granting appellee’s motion and reinstating the appeal on the court’s active docket. In that
same order, we ordered appellants to file their brief in this court on or before April 25, 2019.
Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time to file the brief was filed.
On April 30, 2019, we ordered appellants to file in this court on or before May 10, 2019
their appellants’ brief and a written response reasonably explaining their failure to file their brief.
We advised appellants that if they failed to file their brief and written response as ordered, we
would dismiss their appeal for want of prosecution. See id. R. 38.8(a). Appellants filed neither
their brief nor their written response as ordered by this court.
We therefore order this appeal dismissed for want of prosecution. We further order that
appellee, Triple I. Ranches, A Texas Partnership, recover its costs of this appeal from appellants,
Nancy L. Tankersley and Charlie R. Tankersley.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nancy L. Tankersley and Charlie R. Tankersley v. Triple I. Ranches, a Texas Partnership (Nancy L. Tankersley and Charlie R. Tankersley v. Triple I. Ranches, a Texas Partnership) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.