Nancy L. Johnston (Substituted for William F. Johnston) v. Office of Personnel Management

430 F.3d 1376, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 24657, 2005 WL 3071706
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedNovember 17, 2005
Docket04-3260
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 430 F.3d 1376 (Nancy L. Johnston (Substituted for William F. Johnston) v. Office of Personnel Management) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nancy L. Johnston (Substituted for William F. Johnston) v. Office of Personnel Management, 430 F.3d 1376, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 24657, 2005 WL 3071706 (Fed. Cir. 2005).

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

A petition for rehearing having been filed by the respondent, Office of Personnel Management,

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The petition for rehearing is granted for the limited purpose of modifying the opinion issued on June 28, 2005. The precedential order modifying the opinion is attached.

(2) The mandate of the court will issue on November 25, 2005.

ON RECONSIDERATION

The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) has requested amendment of the court’s opinion, reported at Johnston v. OPM, 413 F.3d 1339 (Fed.Cir.2005), to clarify that the duty to notify Mr. Johnston of his separation and eligibility for disability retirement belonged primarily to the agency that employed Mr. Johnston, rather than OPM. We agree that clarification is warranted. Accordingly, the opinion is modified as follows (with emphases added to show the changes made):

*1377 41B F.3d at 1342, second full paragraph, first sentence is changed to read: “OPM bears the burden of showing that the requisite notice was sent by the agency.”

413 F.3d at 1342, third full paragraph, first sentence is changed to read: “The Board ignored the burden on OPM to show that notice was given by the agency, and

413 F.3d at 1343, first paragraph, last sentence is changed to read: “The burden is on OPM to establish compliance with the statutory and regulatory requirements

413 F.3d 1343, final paragraph, second sentence is changed to read: “... as to whether or when the agency sent or Mr. Johnson received ...

No costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oldanis Disotuar v. Office of Personnel Management
Merit Systems Protection Board, 2024
Jacquelyn Brooks v. Office of Personnel Management
Merit Systems Protection Board, 2022
Taylor v. McDonough
3 F.4th 1351 (Federal Circuit, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
430 F.3d 1376, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 24657, 2005 WL 3071706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nancy-l-johnston-substituted-for-william-f-johnston-v-office-of-cafc-2005.