Nancy Jewell Cross v. Board of Supervisors, San Mateo County
This text of 442 F.2d 362 (Nancy Jewell Cross v. Board of Supervisors, San Mateo County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
442 F.2d 362
Nancy Jewell CROSS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, SAN MATEO COUNTY, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 24137.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
April 23, 1971, Rehearing Denied June 11, 1971.
Nancy Jewell Cross, in pro. per.
Cooper, White & Cooper, Richard J. Archer, James J. Garrett, of Morrison, Foerster, Holloway, Clinton & Clark, O'Connor, Cohn & Lynch, Cyril Viadro, San Francisco, Cal., Norman S. Menifee, Redwood City, Cal., for appellees.
Before MADDEN,1 Judge of the United States Court of Claims, and BROWNING and TRASK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the arguments and authorities cited by appellant, we are satisfied that the action was properly dismissed for the reasons stated in the district court's thorough opinion. See 326 F.Supp. 634 (N.D.Calif.1968).
The judgment is affirmed.
Honorable J. Warren Madden, Judge of the United States Court of Claims, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
442 F.2d 362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nancy-jewell-cross-v-board-of-supervisors-san-mateo-county-ca9-1971.