Nancy Groves v. Westbank Homeowners Association, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Nancy Groves v. Westbank Homeowners Association, Inc.

DecidedAugust 15, 2002

Docket06-02-00108-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Nancy Groves v. Westbank Homeowners Association, Inc. (Nancy Groves v. Westbank Homeowners Association, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nancy Groves v. Westbank Homeowners Association, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-02-00108-CV ______________________________

NANCY GROVES, Appellant

V.

WESTBANK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., ACMP, INC., BUTLER & HAILEY, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, AND ROY D. HAILEY, Appellees

On Appeal from the Number Three County Court at Law Harris County, Texas Trial Court No. 739551

Before Morriss, C.J., Grant and Ross, JJ. Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss

O P I N I O N

Nancy Groves, appellant, has filed a motion asking this Court to dismiss her appeal. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.1, her motion is granted.

The appeal is dismissed.

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: August 14, 2002

Date Decided: August 15, 2002

Do Not Publish

n style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif">

On Appeal from the 71st Judicial District Court

Harrison County, Texas

Trial Court No. 02-1036

Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This Court has been notified that a petition for bankruptcy concerning appellee Charles Bishop has been filed in the United States Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division, under cause number 05-44129. Pursuant to 11 U.S.C.A. § 362 (West 2004), further action in this cause is automatically stayed.

Accordingly, for administrative purposes, this case is abated and will be treated as closed. Any party may reinstate by promptly filing a motion with an attached certified copy of the order showing that the automatic bankruptcy stay has been lifted or terminated and specifying what further action, if any, is required from this Court. In the event of reinstatement, any period that began to run and had not expired at the time of suspension will begin anew when the proceeding is reinstated.

Date Submitted: September 27, 2005

Date Decided: September 28, 2005

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI