Nancy Elizabeth Bowman v. Jerry Davidson and Diana Davidson
This text of Nancy Elizabeth Bowman v. Jerry Davidson and Diana Davidson (Nancy Elizabeth Bowman v. Jerry Davidson and Diana Davidson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ACCEPTED 06-14-00094-CV SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 4/30/2015 2:33:41 PM DEBBIE AUTREY CLERK
FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 4/30/2015 2:33:41 PM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk TABLE OF CONTENTS
INDEX OF AUTHORITIES ................................................ .1
STATEMENT REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT ............................. 1
STATEMENT OF FACTS ................................................ 1
SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT ........................................ 2
ARGUMENT .......................................................... 3
I. BOWMAN IS NOT ENTITLED TO AFFIRMATNE JURY FINDINGS AS A MATTER OF LAW ON THE STRICT LIABILITY SUBMISSION II. THE NEGATIVE ANSWER TO STRICT LIABILITY IS SUPPORTED BY SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE .............................................. 3
III. BOWMAN IS NOT ENTITLED TO AFFIRMATIVE JURY FINDINGS AS A MATTER OF LAW ON STRICT LIABILITY CAUSATION N. THE TRIAL COURT PROPERLY ORDERED PLAINTIFFS TO PRODUCE PROOF OF OWNERSHIP OF ANY ANIMALS FOR WHICH PLAINTIFFS SEEKRECOVERY ................................................. 12
PRAYER ............................................................................................................................ 12
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE .................................................................................. 13
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE .......................................................................................... 13
APPENDIX ......................................................................................................................... 14
ii INDEX OF AUTHORITIES CASES
A&N Collision Ctr. ofAddison, Inc. vs. Town ofAddison, 310 S.W. 3ro 191,193 (Tex.Civ.App.-Dallas 2010, no pet) .................................................. 4
STATEMENT REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
Appellees are of the opinion that oral argument would aid the Court in its analysis
and evaluation of this record. Oral argument is therefore, hereby requested by Appellees.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
Appellees lodge the following objections and disagreements to the following
statements of fact contained in Appellant's Brief:
1. Appellant refers to a long time friend, Billy Strong, being "bitten" by Bubba. Appellees would show that neither Billy Strong nor the Davidsons considered that incident to be a bite, but merely a "nip". When questioned by appellant's counsel, Strong read from the statement he signed that the dog "nipped me on the back of my leg." Appendix Tab 1, 30:11-14; and31:3-5. 4 RR, 94: 21-25. Diana testified the Bubba is ve1y verbal when strangers come up and that he barks and jumps at the fence to give us the indication that someone is there. She has signs out saying 'Beware of Dogs', because she wants people to be aware of them. She goes on to state that Bubba has never bitten anybody. 4 RR94:21-25.
2. Appellant states that when Bubba "bit" Strong, Diana had to holler at Bubba to turn Strong loose. Strong actually testified that he did not remember it as described by Diana in her testimony, but testified, "I know that's not what happened ... the dog ran and he nipped me on the leg and that was it. He let it go". Appendix Tab 1, 45:17 through 46:9.
3. Bowman states that although the Davidsons do not always described the prior incident with Strong as a bite, Strong ce1iainly does. Strong described the incident as a nip on multiple occasions. See references in No. 1 and 2 above.
-1- 4. Bowman states that the Davidsons put Bubba up when children come over because the children might get bit. Bubba is put up when children are around because they run around and heelers will tend to herd them. "Children don't tend to listen to you and they move real fast, and these are heelers."4 RR, l 02: 13-14.
5. Bowman contends there was a "propensity" for Bubba to be dangerous, citing the testimony of Jeny. It is interesting to note that counsel for Bowman continues to use the term "propensity'' when Jerry had ah·eady testified that he did not know the meaning of the word. 4 RR, 132:1-5.
6. Bowman referenced Jeny's testimony that he never knew when Bubba was going to "blow up". It should be noted that the tenn "blow up" was Bowman's counsel's tenninology, not from the mouth of Jerry. 4 RR, 149:25 through 150:5.
7. Bowman contends thattheDavidsons did nothing to properlytrainBubba. The testimony was that Bubba had no fonnal training but in fact there was ample testimony that the Davidsons themselves had trained Bubba. 4 RR 98:20-23; 5 RR 149:10-12, and 5 RR 152:6-7.
SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT
Bowman argues that the evidence established as a matter of law that Bubba had
dangerous propensities abnormal to its class and that the Davidsons knew or should have
known of such propensities. When the entire record is reviewed, just the contraty is actually
established. That is, the only evidence in the record that possibly supp01is a finding argued
by Bowman is that Bubba had nipped a family friend on the back of his leg on one occasion
and that he barks and jumps at the fence when strangers approach the Davidsons' home. The
ovetwhehning evidence presented at trial establishes that Bubba is a family pet that has never
"bitten" anyone, nor have the Davidsons or any of their friends who testified at trial ever seen
Bubba act in a dangerous or aggressive manner.
-2- Perhaps the most telling summaty of the evidence is contained in the testimony of
Bowman's expert on dog behavior, Dr. Lori Haug. She agreed that there was nothing in her
review of this case that even warranted the Davidsons giving the warnings they did. Dr.
Haug believes that had any such evidence existed, it would have come out by the time the
case was tried, at which she testified live.
If the evidence in totality establishes any fact as a matter of law, it would be that
Bubba did not possess any dangerous propensities abnmmal to its class of which the
Davidsons knew or should have known. The Davidsons do not contest that Bubba did bite
Bowman, but this incident was not anticipated nor foreseeable based on their knowledge as
the owners ofBubba since he was a puppy.
The Davidsons' argument set forth below highlights the ovetwhehning amount of
evidence which supports the jmy' s verdict, the judgment entered by the Comi and it supports
the Comi's denial of Bowman's motion for new trial.
ARGUMENT
I. Bowman is not entitled to affirmative jury findings as a matter oflaw on the strict liability submission, and; II. The negative answer to strict liability is supported by sufficient evidence.
Bowman seeks a finding as a matter oflaw that there was no evidence to suppmi the
jury's fmding of no strict liability under the Comi' s instructions and submission in Question
1. For a fact to be conclusively established, that is, found to be one as a matter of law, the
evidence must be such that reasonable tninds could not differ as to the conclusion to be
-3- drawn from the evidence. See A & N Collision Ctr. ofAddison,Inc. vs. Town ofAddison, 310
S.W.3d 191, 193 (Tex.App.-Dallas, 2010, no pet.). Although Appellant cites numerous out
of state cases, The Davidsons believe that the Marshall case and it's progeny accurately sets
forth the law on strict liability as it relates to domestic animals.
A review of the entire record in this matter reveals overwhehning evidence that
Bubba, the dog in question, had never exhibited any dangerous or vicious propensities.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
ACCEPTED 06-14-00094-CV SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 4/30/2015 2:33:41 PM DEBBIE AUTREY CLERK
FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 4/30/2015 2:33:41 PM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk TABLE OF CONTENTS
INDEX OF AUTHORITIES ................................................ .1
STATEMENT REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT ............................. 1
STATEMENT OF FACTS ................................................ 1
SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT ........................................ 2
ARGUMENT .......................................................... 3
I. BOWMAN IS NOT ENTITLED TO AFFIRMATNE JURY FINDINGS AS A MATTER OF LAW ON THE STRICT LIABILITY SUBMISSION II. THE NEGATIVE ANSWER TO STRICT LIABILITY IS SUPPORTED BY SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE .............................................. 3
III. BOWMAN IS NOT ENTITLED TO AFFIRMATIVE JURY FINDINGS AS A MATTER OF LAW ON STRICT LIABILITY CAUSATION N. THE TRIAL COURT PROPERLY ORDERED PLAINTIFFS TO PRODUCE PROOF OF OWNERSHIP OF ANY ANIMALS FOR WHICH PLAINTIFFS SEEKRECOVERY ................................................. 12
PRAYER ............................................................................................................................ 12
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE .................................................................................. 13
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE .......................................................................................... 13
APPENDIX ......................................................................................................................... 14
ii INDEX OF AUTHORITIES CASES
A&N Collision Ctr. ofAddison, Inc. vs. Town ofAddison, 310 S.W. 3ro 191,193 (Tex.Civ.App.-Dallas 2010, no pet) .................................................. 4
STATEMENT REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
Appellees are of the opinion that oral argument would aid the Court in its analysis
and evaluation of this record. Oral argument is therefore, hereby requested by Appellees.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
Appellees lodge the following objections and disagreements to the following
statements of fact contained in Appellant's Brief:
1. Appellant refers to a long time friend, Billy Strong, being "bitten" by Bubba. Appellees would show that neither Billy Strong nor the Davidsons considered that incident to be a bite, but merely a "nip". When questioned by appellant's counsel, Strong read from the statement he signed that the dog "nipped me on the back of my leg." Appendix Tab 1, 30:11-14; and31:3-5. 4 RR, 94: 21-25. Diana testified the Bubba is ve1y verbal when strangers come up and that he barks and jumps at the fence to give us the indication that someone is there. She has signs out saying 'Beware of Dogs', because she wants people to be aware of them. She goes on to state that Bubba has never bitten anybody. 4 RR94:21-25.
2. Appellant states that when Bubba "bit" Strong, Diana had to holler at Bubba to turn Strong loose. Strong actually testified that he did not remember it as described by Diana in her testimony, but testified, "I know that's not what happened ... the dog ran and he nipped me on the leg and that was it. He let it go". Appendix Tab 1, 45:17 through 46:9.
3. Bowman states that although the Davidsons do not always described the prior incident with Strong as a bite, Strong ce1iainly does. Strong described the incident as a nip on multiple occasions. See references in No. 1 and 2 above.
-1- 4. Bowman states that the Davidsons put Bubba up when children come over because the children might get bit. Bubba is put up when children are around because they run around and heelers will tend to herd them. "Children don't tend to listen to you and they move real fast, and these are heelers."4 RR, l 02: 13-14.
5. Bowman contends there was a "propensity" for Bubba to be dangerous, citing the testimony of Jeny. It is interesting to note that counsel for Bowman continues to use the term "propensity'' when Jerry had ah·eady testified that he did not know the meaning of the word. 4 RR, 132:1-5.
6. Bowman referenced Jeny's testimony that he never knew when Bubba was going to "blow up". It should be noted that the tenn "blow up" was Bowman's counsel's tenninology, not from the mouth of Jerry. 4 RR, 149:25 through 150:5.
7. Bowman contends thattheDavidsons did nothing to properlytrainBubba. The testimony was that Bubba had no fonnal training but in fact there was ample testimony that the Davidsons themselves had trained Bubba. 4 RR 98:20-23; 5 RR 149:10-12, and 5 RR 152:6-7.
SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT
Bowman argues that the evidence established as a matter of law that Bubba had
dangerous propensities abnormal to its class and that the Davidsons knew or should have
known of such propensities. When the entire record is reviewed, just the contraty is actually
established. That is, the only evidence in the record that possibly supp01is a finding argued
by Bowman is that Bubba had nipped a family friend on the back of his leg on one occasion
and that he barks and jumps at the fence when strangers approach the Davidsons' home. The
ovetwhehning evidence presented at trial establishes that Bubba is a family pet that has never
"bitten" anyone, nor have the Davidsons or any of their friends who testified at trial ever seen
Bubba act in a dangerous or aggressive manner.
-2- Perhaps the most telling summaty of the evidence is contained in the testimony of
Bowman's expert on dog behavior, Dr. Lori Haug. She agreed that there was nothing in her
review of this case that even warranted the Davidsons giving the warnings they did. Dr.
Haug believes that had any such evidence existed, it would have come out by the time the
case was tried, at which she testified live.
If the evidence in totality establishes any fact as a matter of law, it would be that
Bubba did not possess any dangerous propensities abnmmal to its class of which the
Davidsons knew or should have known. The Davidsons do not contest that Bubba did bite
Bowman, but this incident was not anticipated nor foreseeable based on their knowledge as
the owners ofBubba since he was a puppy.
The Davidsons' argument set forth below highlights the ovetwhehning amount of
evidence which supports the jmy' s verdict, the judgment entered by the Comi and it supports
the Comi's denial of Bowman's motion for new trial.
ARGUMENT
I. Bowman is not entitled to affirmative jury findings as a matter oflaw on the strict liability submission, and; II. The negative answer to strict liability is supported by sufficient evidence.
Bowman seeks a finding as a matter oflaw that there was no evidence to suppmi the
jury's fmding of no strict liability under the Comi' s instructions and submission in Question
1. For a fact to be conclusively established, that is, found to be one as a matter of law, the
evidence must be such that reasonable tninds could not differ as to the conclusion to be
-3- drawn from the evidence. See A & N Collision Ctr. ofAddison,Inc. vs. Town ofAddison, 310
S.W.3d 191, 193 (Tex.App.-Dallas, 2010, no pet.). Although Appellant cites numerous out
of state cases, The Davidsons believe that the Marshall case and it's progeny accurately sets
forth the law on strict liability as it relates to domestic animals.
A review of the entire record in this matter reveals overwhehning evidence that
Bubba, the dog in question, had never exhibited any dangerous or vicious propensities.
Tln·oughout the trial, Bowman's counsel continually included the tenn "propensity" while
questioning witnesses. It is obvious from the record as a whole, that there were no prior
incidents involving Bubba that would have put a reasonable person on notice that there was
any likelihood or any probability that Bubba would ever bite or attack anyone. Rather, the
record reflects the opinions of most every witness who appeared agree there is the
"possibility'' for most any dog to bite under some circumstances. The Davidsons will
address specific pmtions of the testimony which provide ample evidence to suppmt the
jury's fmdings that Bubba did not have dangerous propensities abnormal to its class nor that
the Davidsons knew or should have known of any such alleged dangerous propensities.
Bowman argues that the evidence conclusively establishes that Bubba was aggressive,
protective and possessive. When asked specifically what aggressive meant to her, Diana
Davidson (Diana herein) testified that if a stranger or anyone approaches, Bubba barks and
he jumps at the gate. Diana calls his protectiveness "aggression" because he is protective of
her. 5RR 154: 7-17. Diana had previously testified in response to knowing of the dogs
-4- "aggression", she stated that he is very verbal when strangers approach. "He barks, jumps at
the fence, and gives us the indication that someone is there." Diana has signs out because
she wants people to be aware of the dog and states that the dog has never bitten anybody.
4RR 94: 20-25. The warning signs posted at the residence were not specifically for Bubba,
but had been there for over 30 years. 4RR 111:18-22. Jeny Davidson's (Jeny herein)
testimony confirmed that the warning signs had been present for 30-plus years, ever since
they have lived there. 5RR 137:2-3. When asked when he first realized the dog was
aggressive and protective, Jeny responded that he "never realized that the dog was
aggressive, protective yes, but not aggressive". 4RR 130: 20-23.
Bowman's counsel continuously questioned J eny about Bubba' s "propensity". At one
point, Jerry stated that he didn't even know the meaning of the word "propensity''. 4RR 132:
4-5. Jerry latertestifiedonceagain thatthedogisnotdangerous. 4RR 146:6-10. WhenJeny
takes Bubba out ofthe yard to go anywhere, Bubba does not offer to bite anyone. 4RR 148:
23-24.
Bowman testified that Bubba had done nothing that concemed her until the bite
occutTed. 4RR, 62: 4-7. Bowman also agreed that Bubba seemed to act friendly towards her
prior to the bite. 4RR 62: 9-12. Bowman fmiher agrees that she was aware that all dogs can
be dangerous and that there is potential for any dog to bite under ce1iain circumstances. 4RR
64:20-25 and 65:1. Bowman saw no aggressive conduct on the pari of Bubba nor saw
anything to indicate Bubba' s possessiveness. 4RR 67:2-13. Bowman testified that other than
-5- the nip to Billy Strong, she has not heard anything that she could say was dangerous about
Bubba. 4RR 79: 14-16. After first testifying that she had heard other witnesses indicate Bubba
had a tendency to bite, Bowman subsequently revised that testimony that she had only heard
other witnesses testify as to Bubba's possessiveness. 4RR 79:25 though 80:5.
Bubba is not an outside dog but actually lives in the house with the Davidsons and
outside. 4RR 89:8-13. Diana stated that Bubba has never bitten anybody. 4RR 94:25. The
watnings given to visitors are not because of any history of the dog, but because Bubba is
vety protective of Diana and if he does not know someone, he will bark at them. These are
warnings given with all of Diana's dogs. 4RR 95:13-18.
The Davidsons called several family friends who have been around Bubba on
numerous occasions while in the Davidsons presence. Their testimony as to Bubba' s conduct
and personality is conduct that would have been observed by Diana and/or Jerry. The first
witness was Judge Nancy George, Justice of the Peace, Precinct 4, Harrison County. 4RR
116:14-19. Judge George testified thatBubbahadnever been aggressive towards her and that
she has never had any concerns about Bubba. 4RR 119:24-25 and 120:1-2. Judge George
further testified that she has never been concemed that Bubba might bite anyone nor has
Bubba ever done anything towards a human being that she would consider aggressive or
inappropriate in any way. 4RR124:11-14, 21-24.
A second fatnily friend, Amlette Squier, has never had any concems aboutBubba and
has never seen him do anything that she thought was dangerous, vicious or anything like that.
-6- Bubba has never acted adversely towards her in any way and she has never seen him act
adverse to anyone in any way. 5RR 108:9-24. She stated that Bubba is always so friendly and
is not vicious. 5RR 110:10-11. Squier told of her deceased husband and Bubba rolling
around on the couch together. 5RR 110: 13 through 111 :1. Squier saw Bubba do nothing on
the evening of the incident to indicate he did not like Bowman nor did he act out of the
ordinmy in any way. 5RR 111:11-17. Squier does not believe that there was any incident that
caused the Davidsons to advise people of how to act around Bubba. 5RR 115:9-17.
The third family friend is Gladys Fant, who is the retired ChiefDeputy of the Hanison
County Tax Office. 5RR 120:21-22 and 121:12-19. Fant has never had any concerns about
Bubba being aggressive towards her nor is she aware ofBubba ever biting anyone. She was
told that Bubba "nipped" somebody but was not aware of that until after this case came up.
5RR 123:10-18. Also, in all of the times Fant has been around Bubba, she has never
observed him act aggressively towards another person. 5RR 124:8-11.
Another friend, Sherry Rushing, testified that Bubba never acted adversely towards
her, she never had any concerns about Bubba and never saw him act aggressively towards
anyone. 5RR 129:3-13.
A fifth family friend, Anita Scott, testified that Bubba has never acted aggressively,
viciously or abnormally towards her or anyone else. 5RR 135:15-21. On the night of the
incident, Scott saw nothing about Bubba that was odd, different, inappropriate or that
concerned her or made her think that Bubba should be put up. 5RR 139:3-9.
-7- When Diana was called during Defendant's case in chief, she testified regarding a
prior blue heeler that they owned, Maggie, that they kept up when anyone was over because
she never wanned up to people. 5RR 150:2-16. Diana obviously appreciated the difference
in the personalities of her dogs and took appropriate measures when the dog's conduct
warranted such. Bubba was never muzzled and never offered to bite anyone. 5RR 149:4-7
and 150:20-25. The Davidsons do not even put a leash on Bubba when they take him out
walking and that he is vety docile outside of his own turf. It is that he is protective of his
house and family. Bubba is absolutely not dangerous or vicious. 5RR 154:20- 155:2-11 and
5RR 157:12-15.
Much is made in Bowman's brief of the prior "bite" involving Billy Strong. As
previously referenced, Strong himself described the incident on more than one occasion in
his testimony as being a "nip" or "being nipped" by Bubba. Strong had never observed
Bubba being aggressive towards anyone. Appendix Tab 1, 14:17-22. On the night of the
incident, he did not notice Bubba exhibiting any type of behavior that he would consider
aggressive or showing anger or anything similar. Appendix Tab 1, 35:11-15. Nothing
occut1'ed the night of the incident that would have put anyone on notice that Bubba needed
to be put up. Appendix Tab 1, 60:8-11. Strong had never known Bubba to bite, that is, get
a hold of someone, before the time Bubba nipped him. Appendix Tab 1, 31:16-18. He
testified that he believes he scared Bubba when he ran towards the door and Bubba simply
reacted to him running. Appendix Tab 1, 42:18-23. After the nipping incident, Strong has had
-8- no concem that Bubba might bite him again. Appendix Tab 1, 60:19-21. When the nip
occutTed, Diana did "fuss" atBubba, according to Strong. Appendix Tab 1, 31:10-13. When
Bowman's counsel attempted to put words in Strong's mouth as to his opinion that it was just
a matter of time before this happened, Strong disagreed and indicated that he would not have
thought anything like this would have happened. Appendix Tab 1, 62: 16-19. Rather than the
dangerous dog Bowman's counsel seeks to pmiray, Strong's description of his relationship
with Bubba more accurate1yreflects Bubba's nature. That is, Strong states that when he goes
to the Davidson's home, Bubba likes to see him, comes and jumps on him, which Strong
calls being "Bubbatized". Appendix Tab 1, 54:9-25.
Bowman's dog behavior expert, Dr. Lori Haug, DVM, agreed that the nipping at the
heel incident with Strong, or nipping at the heels in general, for herding dogs is second
nature to them. 5RR 55:5-10. Dr.Haug also agreed that how the event occutTed with Strong
could have been that Bubba was statiled, resulting in the nipping incident. 5RR 60:18-21.
As to the issue of the Davidson's knowledge ofBubba's nature, Dr. Bruce Bradley,
DVM, Bubba's veterinarian, testified that a dog's owneris the best qualified person to know
what that dog's behavioris going to be ina certain situation. Appendix Tab 3, 15:11-15. Dr.
Bradley also stated that in all the times he had treated Bubba, he has no recollection nor is
there anything in his records that indicate that Bubba was aggressive or threatening towards
him or anyone else. Appendix Tab 3, 23:3-12.
Dr. Haug, testified that she was sure that the Davidsons never envisioned something
-9- this serious happening, but rather only that something "may'' happen, which was the basis
for the warnings. 5RR 14:9-24. According to Dr. Haug, a dog's past behavior is an important
predictor of what may happen in the future. 5RR 24:8-12. The only past behavior was the
nipping incident with Strong and that Bubba barks and will jump at the fence when strangers
come to the house. Haug further agrees that barking, or as she refers to it as "alann barking",
is not necessarily problematic. 5RR 29:10-12. Dr. Haug also testified that the Davidsons
probably did not foresee this severity of a bite occurring. 5RR 57:19:20.
Although not related specifically to the Davidson' knowledge or foreseeing such an
incident, Dr. Haug provides additional testimony which supports the jmy's finding of no
strict liability. When Dr. Haug was asked by Bowman's counsel what was her opinion on
the ultimate question for the jmy, she stated that she felt like the Davidsons did have
adequate knowledge that something "may'' happen. 5RR 14:8-10. The doctor's opinion falls
far short of the threshold for forseeability of an event to occur, in that most anything may
happen as opposed to an opinion based on probability, that is, what is probable or likely to
occur. Dr. Haug's testimony is futiher weakened by her admission that there is a potential
for most any dog to bite. 5RR 54:25 tlu·ough 55:1. She found no evidence in this case that
Bubba had ever bitten anyone other than the nip to Strong, no evidence that there was ever
anytlu·eatening barking by Bubba, no evidence ofBubba ever lunging at anyone, no evidence
that Bubba ever did anything aggressive, that is, snarled, bit, jumped on, hurt in any way any
ofthepeoplewhen they were first exposed to the dog. 5RR44:12-14, 45:9-12,46:1-5,47:8-
-10- 13.
Dr. Haug testified on Page 16, Line 8 of her deposition that up until the time of the
bite to Bowman, she would not have considered Bubba to be a dangerous dog. 5RR 54:1-11.
At trial, she changed, or at least modified, her testimony from a "no" answer as to whether
Bubba was dangerous to "no with a qualifier". 5RR 54:11-23. This change of opinion in
front of the jmy allows the jury to accept or reject either opinion in their role as not only the
fact fmders, but in their capacity to evaluate the credibility of each witness. Dr. Haug
testified about red flags or triggers indicating potential propensities. However, she admitted
that the average dog owner cannot be expected to know how to assess these potential
dangers. 5RR 59:3-19. She specifically agreed that the Davidsons certainly should not be
held to the level of knowledge of someone like herself. 5RR 58:23-59:1. Finally, she
admitted that there was nothing in the transcript or record of this case that she had seen that
wan·anted the wamings regarding the Davidsons' dog. She stated that "you would think" any
such evidence would have come out by the time this matter went to trial. 5RR 58:9-14.
Bowman has attempted to paint the picture that Bubba had no training and no "mles"
but that the only mles were for the Davidsons guests. Diana testified that she has trained all
of her dogs not to be that way (aggressive/possessive). 4RR 98:21-23. Diana's response to
the nipping incident with Strong was to correct the dog. 4RR 99:21-23. When asked whether
she or Jeny trained Bubba, Diana stated that she did. 5RR 149:10cl2. Diana also trained
Bubba with hand signals. 5RR 152:6-7.
-11- These excerpts from the record provides more than sufficient evidence to not only
create a fact question, thereby eliminating the matter of law point, but is clearly sufficient to
support the jury's verdict.
III. Bowman is not entitled to affirmative jury findings as a matter oflaw on the strict liability causation submission, and; IV. The negative answer to causation is supported by sufficient evidence.
The Davidsons do not contest that Bubba bit Bowman on the occasion in question.
However, as set fmih in the argument above, there is ovetwhehning evidence to support the
jmy' s fmding to the strict liability question (Appellant's Issue One). Appellees hereby adopt
by reference, as if set fmih herein in its entirety, the argument set forth in Argument I and
II above. As instructed by the Court, the jury did not answer Question 2 based on their
negative answer to Question 1.
In summaty, the testimony clearly established a fact question as to whether Bubba had
dangerous propensities abnormal to its class of which the Davidsons knew or should have
known. The Davidsons presented not just "some evidence" on this issue, but an abundance
of credible testimony in support the jmy' s verdict and the judgment entered in this cause.
PRAYER
For the reasons set forth above, the Davidsons request that this Couti affmn the jmy' s
verdict and the Trial Couti's judgment, and for such other and further relief, whether at law
or in equity, to which they may show themselves justly entitled.
-12- Respectfully submitted,
BOYD & BROWN, P.C.
BY: Is! Alan E. Brown ALAN E. BROWN State Bar No. 03090500 1215 Pruitt Place Tyler, Texas 75703 903/526-9000 903/526-9001 (FAX) aebrown@suddenlinkmail.com ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEES
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
In compliance with TRAP 9.4(i)(3), counsel for Appellees certifies that the number
of words in Appellees' brief is three thousand eight hundred twenty (3,820).
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby cetiif)rthat on this the 30th day of April, 2015, a true and correct copy of the above
and foregoing instmment was forwarded via electronic filing, Facsimile and/or E-mail, to:
Jack Sanders, Jr. 109 East Houston P.O. Box 1387 Marshall, TX 75671-1387 Facsimile: (903) 938-8616 [ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT]
Is! Alan E. Brown ALAN E. BROWN
-13- CASE NO. 06-14-00094-CV
IN THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXJUUCANA,TEXAS
Nancy Bowman, Appellant,
vs.
Jerry Davidson and Diana Davidson Appellees.
On Appeal from the 71" Judicial District Harrison County, Texas Cause No. 13-0618 The Honorable Brad Morin, Presiding
APPENDIX
ALAN E. BROWN State Bar No. 03090500 BOYD & BROWN, P.C. 1215 Pmitt Place ·Tyler, Texas 75703 XXX-XX-XXXX 903-526-9001 Fax aebrown@suddenlinkmail.com ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEES
-14- APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS
DOCUMENTS TAB
Transcript excerpts Deposition of Billy Strong 1
Transcript excetpts Deposition of Bruce Bradley, DVM 2
-15- ·l. Page 1
1 CAUSE NO. 13-0618 ( 2 NANCY ELIZABETH BOWMAN, ) IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff, ) 3 ) vs. ) HARRISON COUNTY, TEXAS 4 ) JERRY DAVIDSON AND ) 5 DIANA DAVIDSON, ) Defendants. ) 71ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT 6
7 ********************************************************
8 ORAL AND VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF 9 BILLY STRONG 10 NOVEMBER 18, 2013 11 VOLUME 1 OF 1 IJ OP.IC:lNAL 12 ******************************************************** (\. ;r -·;,.,· 13 ( 14 ORAL AND VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF BILLY STRONG, 15 produced as a witness at the instance of the Defendant, 16 and duly sworn, was taken in the above-styled and 17 numbered cause on the 18th day of November, 2013 from 18 4:34p.m. to 5:43p.m., before Terri Lynn Smith, CSR 19 in and for the State of Texas, reported by computerized 20 stenotype machine, at the offices of Mr. Jack Sanders, 21 Jr., 109 East Houston Street, Marshall, Texas, pursuant 22 to the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure and the provisions 23 stated on the record or attached hereto. 24
EXHIBIT nc.
Electronically signed by Terri Lynn Smith (601·237·608-4107) I_....)__ 16a5edOf·8 516 -4c02·81 c c-9c8298f78 b4c Page 2
1 A P P E A R A N C E S ( 2 MR. JACK SANDERS, JR. 3 ATTORNEY AT LAW 109 East Houston Street 4 Marshall, Texas 75671 Telephone: (903) 935-7172 5 Facsimile: ( 903) 938-8 616 6 COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF: Nancy Elizabeth Bowman 7
8 MR. ALAN E. BROWN BOYD & BROWN, P.C. 9 1215 Pruitt Place Tyler, Texas 75703 10 Telephone: (903) 526-9000 Facsimile: (903) 526-9001 11 COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS: Jerry Davidson and 12 Diana Davidson ·, 13 ' 14
·15
16 ALSO PRESENT: Mr. Dart Leigh, videographer Ms. Nancy Elizabeth Bowman 17
Deposition Resources, Inc. 800.295.4109 Electronically signed by Terri Lynn Smith (601-237-608-4107) 16a5ed0f-8516-4c02-81 cc-9 c8 298178 b4c Page 3
1 INDEX
2 PAGE
3 Appearances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
4 EXAMINATION
5 THE WITNESS: BILLY STRONG
6 Examination by Mr. Brown. . . . . .. . . . .. . 4
7 Examination by Mr. Sanders. . . . . .. . . . . 45 8 Examination by Mr. Brown. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
9 Examination by Mr. Sanders. . .. . . . . . . . . 61
'10 Reporter's Certificate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
12 EXHIBITS
13 NO. DESCRIPTION PAGE ( '• 14 4 Billy Strong's Handwritten Statement ........ . 29
22 REPORTER'S NOTE
23 Quotation marks are used for clarity and do not necessarily indicate a direct quote. 24
(
Deposition Resources, Inc. 800.295.4109 Electronically signed by Terri Lynn Smith (601·237·608-4107) 16a5ed0f·8516·4C02·B1CC·9 c829Bf7 Bb4c Page 8 1 Q. And been in Harrison County ever since?
2 A. Ever since.
3 Q. All right. Married?
4 A. Yes.
5 Q. Okay.
6 A. Then.
7 Q. Okay.
8 A. Are you talking about now?
9 Q. Now are you married?
10 A. No.
11 Q. Okay. Have been married?
12 A. Yes.
13 Q. Okay. How long have you known the Davidsons?
14 A. Twenty-five years.
15 Q. Okay. Now, am I correct, did you sing or play
16 in a band or singing group that Diana had at one time?
17 A. Yes; still do.
18 Q. Oh, okay. Is there a name of the group?
19 A. Southern Legacy.
20 Q. Okay. What -- do y'all do country, or what
21 kind of music is it?
22 A. A lo~ of different kinds.
23 Q. Okay.
24 A. You have country, dance music, big band stuff
Deposition Resources, Inc. 800.295.4109 Electronically signed by Terri Lynn Smith (601·237·608-4107) 16a5edOf-8516-4c0 2·81 cc-9c829 8178 b4c Page 11 1 Q. Does his wife work outside the home?
2 A. No.
3 Q. Okay. And so he's the only relative in the
4 county?
5 A. Yes.
6 Q. Now, we're -- we're here today to take your
7 deposition in regards to this lawsuit we have pending
8 here in Harrison County that Ms. Bowman had brought
9 against the Davidsons. You -- you understand that,
10 correct?
11 A. Yes.
12 Q. And -- and you were present at the Davidson's
13 home the night of this incident? ( 14 A. Yes.
15 Q. All right. I assume you had been at the
16 Davidsons on occasions before this evening,
17 get-togethers, eating dinner, that kind of thing?
18 A. Yes.
19 Q. Is that something y'all do fairly frequently?
20 A. Yes.
21 Q. Okay. Is it generally some -- sort of the same
22 group or pretty much the same group that gets together
23 over there?
24 A. Yes.
25 Q. Okay. Several of y'all live right there close
Deposition Resources, Inc. 800.295.4109 Electronically signed by Terri Lynn Smith (601·237·6084107) 16a5ed0f·85164c02·81 cc-9c8298178b4c Page 12 1 together, right?
2 A. Yes.
3 Q. Okay. And y'all have been doing this for how
4 long?
5 A. Three years probably. Yeah. Actually,
6 probably longer than that, but since we built that
7 building back there, it's been about that long, so ....
8 Q. Okay. And when you say "that building," you're
9 talking about the little house right behind the --
10 A. Yes.
11 Q. Davidson's?
12 Call -- I think we've referred to it
13 earlier in depositions like the music house? ( 14 A. Yes.·
15 Q. Okay. And is that a place where the four of
16 . the group there four in the group, would y'all
17 practice, rehearse in that -- that room?
18 A. Yes; and play. We have parties over there
19 sometimes.
20 Q. Okay. So it's big enough to perform and have a
21 few people in?
22 A. Yes.
23 Q. Okay. And you're familiar with the dogs owned v 24 by the Davidsons?
25 A. Yes.
Deposition Resources, Inc. 800.295.4109 Electronically signed by Terri Lynn Smith (601-237-608-4107) 16a5ed0f-8516-4c02-B 1cc-9c829Bf78 b4c Page 13 1 Q. Do you know how long they've had these -- the
2 two dogs they have right now?
3 A. Ten years, I think.
4 Q. Now, you said you've
5 A. That's --
6 Q. -- lived out there ten years. Were they there
7 or
8 A. Yeah. They came right after that. So it's
9 been I was just -- I don't know how long old the
10 dogs actually are. I've been there since they came,
11 so .. ·..
12 Q. Okay. And have you had frequent occasions to
13 be around their dogs? ( 14 A. Yes.
15 Q. Okay. There's one male, one female; is that
16 right?
17 A. Yes.
18 Q. And is it your understanding they're brother
19 and sister?
21 Q. All right. And do you know the names of the
22 dogs?
23 A. Yes.
24 Q. What are they?
25 A. Bubba and Sissy, or Dakota and Cheyenne,
Deposition Resources, Inc. 800.295.4109 Electronically signed by Terri Lynn Smith (601·237·608-4107) 16a5ed0f·8516-4c02·81 cc-9c829 Bf78b4c Page 14 1 however you want to call them that.
2 Q. Okay. When you first started being around
3 these dogs, did they ever, in any way, threaten you, or
4 did you ever feel threate.ned or feel afraid around these
5 dogs?
6 A. No.
7 Q. Okay. When you first started being around
8 these dogs, did either Diana or Jerry ever sort of tell
9 you, give you any instructions about-being around the
10 dogs or anything like that?
11 A. No.
12 Q. Okay. Had you been around them since they were
13 fairly small? \ 14 A. Yes.
15 Q. So they've known you for a long time?
16 A. All their life.
17 Q. Okay. Had -- before the incident that our
18 lawsuit is about, which occurred -- I believe our date
19 is June the 24th of 2012, not quite a year and a half
20 ago. Before that, had you ever observed either of the
21 dogs being aggressive towards anyone?
22 A. No.
23 Q. Okay. Had you ever -- had you ever been at the
24 house when, say, someone comes to the front door, maybe
25 someone that's not in sort of the group that come by the
Deposition Resources, Inc. 800.295.4109 Electronically signed by Terri Lynn Smith {601-237-608-4107) 16a5ed0f-8516-4c02-81 cc-9c8298f78b4c Page 15 1 house often, had you ever been there when, like, a guest
2 might come to the front door and observe the dogs, how
3 they might react?
4 A. I don't know. Everybody goes to the back door.
5 Q. Okay. In other words, everybody that knows
6 them?
7 A. Yes.
8 Q. Okay. In other words, everybody that knows the
9 Davidsons, they just know you go to the back door?
10 A. Yes. Pretty much, yeah.
11 Q. Okay. Why? Why? Is that just where they're
12 going to be or
13 A. Yeah. Everybody's in the back--
14 Q. Okay.
15 A. -- so -- normally.
16 Q. How often are you over at the Davidson's house?
17 A. Two or three times a week.
18 Q. Okay. Do you always eat a meal when you go
19 over?
20 A. No. 21 Q. Okay. What all would be the occasions that
22 you're over, say that often?
23 A. Just visit.
24 Q. Okay. Do you consider them good friends?
Deposition Resources, Inc. 800.295.4109 Electronically signed by Terri Lynn Smith (601·237·608-4107} 16a5ed0f-8516-4c02-81cc-9c8298!78b4c Page 20 1 period of time before y'all went into the house to eat,
2 correct?
3 A. Yes.
4 Q. Give me your best estimate. How long do you
5 think y'all were out just sort of~playing,· visiting,
6 singing, whatever?
7 A. Maybe a hour and a half.
8 Q. Okay.
9 A. That's a guess.
10 Q. All right. For a while?
12 Q. All right. Now, during that time frame, did
13 you did you observe any interaction between Ms. ( 14 Bowman· and either one of the Davidson's dogs?
15 A. No.
16 Q. Okay. Did you -- did you make any -- first of
17 all, do you remember talking directly to Ms. Bowman
18 yourself while y'all were either in the music house or
19 on the patio, in other words, out -- out -- out of the
20 house?
21 A. Yes.
22 Q. Okay. Did -- did someone introduce you to her?
23 A. Well, yes.
24 Q. Okay. Was that Danny or someone else?
25 A. Yes, Danny.
Deposition Resources, Inc. 800.295.4109 Electronically signed by Terri Lynn Smith (601-237-608-4107) 16a5ed0f·8516-4c02·81cc-9c8298f78b4c ,, .---------------------------------------------------. Page 26 1 Q. And do you remember who was next to Ms. Bowman?
2 A. And that's, I think, Annette. I can't remember
3 if it was Annette or George. I don't remember.
4 Q. Okay.
5 A. One of those two there.
6 Q. That's fine.
7 A. I was trying to ....
8 Q. How about Danny? Do you remember where Danny
9 was?
10 A: I was thinking Danny was on the end, but that's
11 where·he always sits, but so it may not be that he
12 was there. It might just be my, you know, thinking
13 that's where he was. ( 14 Q. Danny often sits at the end to --
15 A. At the end.
16 Q. which would be to your right?
18 Q. Okay. But you're not sure?
19 A. No. I can't be absolutely positive about it.
20 Q. All right. Are you sure where Diana was?
22 Q. And are you sure where Ms. Bowman was?
24 Q. Okay. Once y'all went inside the house, do you
25 remember hearing any conversation with or directed to
Deposition Resources, Inc. 800.295.4109 Electronically signed by Terri Lynn Smith (601·237·608-4107) 16a5ed0f·B516·4c02-81 cc-9c829 8f78b4c / Page 27 1 Ms. Bowman about the dog, anything about feeding the dog
2 from the table or anything like that?
3 A. I think I remember them saying not to feed the
4 dog. Now, that's what I -- I think. I can't be
5 positive about that either, though, but ....
6 Q. Okay. Who who do you remember?
7 A. That would be Diana.
9 A. She would instruct us.
10 Q. Do you recall if Ms. Bowman had made any
11 comment or asked Diana anything about feeding the dog?
12 A. No. I don't remember.
13 Q. Okay. When the bite occurred, how long had ( 14 y'all been seated at the table?
15 A. Maybe 30 minutes, I'm I think. We had
16 already been eating, so ....
17 Q. Okay. Did you -- did you actually see when the
18 bite occurred?
19 A. Yes.
20 Q. Okay. Tell us what you observed. What did you
21 see?
22 A. Well, I saw the dog was sitting between Diana
23 and Ms. Bowman, and she had turned to -- I don't know i f
24 she was feeding the dog or just looking at him. I don't
25 know. But when she turned and -- and looked at him in
Deposition Resources, Inc. 800.295.4109 ElectrQnlcally signed by Terri Lynn Smith (601·237·608-4107) 16a5ed0f-8516-4c02·81 cc-9 cB 298178 b4c Page 28 1 the face, he jumped up and got her there.
2 Q. Okay. So could you actually see the dog -- 3 A. Yes.
4 Q. -- part of the dog when -- when he bit?
6 Q. Okay. Do you recall before the bite, I mean,
7 was the dog making noise or doing anything, or was it
8 just sort of out of the blue?
9 A. No. He was just sitting there.
10 Q. Now, you said Ms. Bowman leaned, what, in the L 11 direction of the dog?
13 Q. Now, would that have -- so if the dog's between ( 14 Ms. Bowman and Diana, that-- she was then leaning in
15 the direction also of Diana?
16 A. Yes.
17 Q. Had the dog, Bubba -- when.I say "the dog,"
18 we're, at this point, talking about Bubba. Okay? We
19 understand that?
21 Q. All right. Had Bubba bitten people, anybody
22 before that you were aware of?
24 Q. Okay. Who?
25 A. Me.
Deposition Resources, Inc. 800.295.4109 Electronically signed by Terri Lynn Smith (601·237-608-4107) 16a5ed0f-B516-4c02-81 cc-9c829Bf78 b4c Page 29 1 Q. Okay. Matter of fact, you wrote out a little
2 statement about that, correct?
4 Q. All right. I'm going -- this is a co -- you --
5 you wrote this out yourself?
7 Q. Or did you sign is that your --
8 A. I signed it.
9 Q. Okay.
10 A. Okay.
11 Q. Let me know show you. This is Exhibit 4 that
12 we've used today. It's Exhibit 4 to Diana's deposition.
13 Let me just show you a copy of that, and that's a ( 14 statement that you -- you signed the bottom, correct?
15 A. Yes.
16 (Exhibit 4 identified.)
17 Q. (By Mr. Brown) Okay. Do you know who actually
18 wrote out the statement?
19 A. No. I don't remember.
20 Q. Okay. Wnat was the occasion that you signed
21 this statement?
22 A. I -- I was thinking -- I don't know. Maybe
23 Jack -- yes. Okay. I didn't know if this had come from
24 on -- Mr. Sanders there or had asked me about what had
25 happened.
Deposition Resources, Inc. 800.295.4109 Electronically signed by Terri Lynn Smith (601-237-606-4107) 16a5ed0f-B516-4t:02·81 cc-9c629Bf78 b4c /
Page 30 1 Q. Okay.
2 A. Okay. That's when I signed it.
3 Q. So so you told Jack or someone in his
4 office
6 Q. -- about what happened, and somebody wrote it
7 out and then you signed it saying, Yeah, that's --
8 A. Yes.
9 Q. -- that's what happened?
11 Q. Okay. Okay. Now, when it says that -- what
12 does it say? It says, I was bitten or the dog bit me.
13 What's the language there?
14 A. "Nipped me on the back of my leg."
15 Q. Okay. Do you remember the occasion, sort of
16 what -- I mean, were you just sitting around or can you
17 -- do you remember what was happening that the dog did
18 that?
20 Q. What -- tell us -- tell us what occurred.
21 A. They had had a repairman there to work on their
22 heater, and he had gotten up and left and forgot his bag
23 of tools and was out in his car fixing to leave, and
24 Diana asked me to take the bag of tools out. So I
25 grabbed the tools and I took off at a trot towards the
Deposition Resources, Inc. 800.295.4109 Electronically signed by Terri Lynn Smith (601-237-608-4107) 16a5ed0f-8516-4c02-81 cc-9 c8298f78b4c Page 31 1 front door, and Bubba got me.
2 Q. Okay.
3 A. He nipped me on the back of the leg.
4 Q. All right. Did -- did it break the skin?
5 A. No.
6 Q. Okay. Just left a red mark or --
7 A. Yeah; bruised, but ....
8 Q. Okay. Did you seek ariy medical attention?
9 A. No.
10 Q. Okay. Do you remember when he did that, did
11 Diana respond? Did she holler at the dog or anything?
12 Do you remember?
p A. Yes. She fussed at him.
14 Q. Okay. Other than that occurrence -- well, let
15 me strike that.
16 Had you ever known Bubba to do that,
17 actually, you know, bite, get ahold of somebody before?
18 A. No.
19 Q. Had you ever observed Bubba out working,
20 messing with the cows?
21 A. Not really, no.
22 Q. Okay.
23 A. He doesn't go out there much.
24 Q. Okay. Now, do you know what breed of dog Bubba
25 is?
Deposition Resources, Inc. 800.295.4109 Electronically signed by Terri Lynn Smith (601-237-608-4107) 16a5ed0f-B516-4c02·B1 cc-9c829Bf7Bb4c Page 32 1 A. Yes. I ' 2 Q. What is it?
3 A.· Blue heeler.
4 Q. Do you know much about blue heelers?
5 A. I just know how protective they are, and they
6 like to herd things, but, you know.
8 A. I've got a red heeler. That's why I know.
9 Q. So are they sort of kin to each other?
10 A. A little.
11 Q. Is a red heeler, are they also a herding ~og?
13 Q. Okay. Do you know, does your dog have sort of
14 the same characteristics or tendencies of herding and
15 doing things like nipping heels of animals, cattle,
16 whatever, to herd?
18 Q. Okay. Ever had any problems with your dog
19 biting people?
20 A. No.
21 Q. Okay. So other than the occasion when Bubba
22 grabbed you when you were trotting through the -- you
23 were in, what, in their living room area?
25 Q. Heading to the front door?
Deposition Resources, Inc. 800.295.4109 Electronically signed by Terri Lynn Smith (601·237·608-4107) 16a5ed0f·8516-4c02-81 cc-9c829Bf78b4c ,.
Page 35 1 and they don't want anything to happen to them or
2 something like that. That's ....
3 Q. On the evening of this event, do you remember
4 anything being said by anybody about, you know, do you
5 want us to put the dogs up, or why don't we put the dogs
6 up, or should we put the dogs up? Any comment like
7 that. Do you remember --
8 A. No.
9 Q. -- anything like that being said? 10 A. No.
11 Q. Okay. Did -- before the bite that evening, did
12 Bubba ever exhibit any type of behavior that you would
13 call aggressive or showing anger or aggression, anything ( 14 like that?
16 Q. So had anything occurred that evening that you
17 believe would have put a reasonable person on notice
18 that, you know, the dog's, you know, not liking the new
19 person that's here or anything like that?
20 A. Not that I remember, no.
21 Q. Okay. Have you -- have you talked to Danny
22 Alexander since this incident?
24 Q. About -- about what happened?
25 A. About this incident? No.
Deposition Resources, Inc. 800.295.4109 Electronically signed by Terri Lynn Smith (601-237-608-4107) 16a5ed0f-B516-4c02-81 cc-9c829Bf78b4c Page 38 1 know, I'm thinking, well, he nipped me, you know. 2 Q. He might get somebody else? 3 A. Yeah. He might get somebody. I've known him, 4 .you know, since he was brought there, a puppy, so .... 5 Q. How long was it from the time when he nipped 6 you until he bit Ms. Bowman? .7 A. Maybe a year. 8 Q. Okay. 9 A. That's a guess. 10 Q. In that year or so, did any -- was there any .· f 11 other incident, anything else happen that made you any 12 more concerned or was that sort of it? 13 A. No. That was it. ' \ 14 Q. Okay. Did Diana ever say anything to you after 15 he bit you that she was more concerned or anything or -- 16 A. No. 17 Q. Okay. Does the -- does Bubba respond to Diana? 18 In other words, if Diana gives him a command or 19 whatever, does the dog respond to Diana? 20 A. Yes. 21 Q. How about to Jerry? 22 A. Yes. 23 Q. Equally the same or more one than the other? 24 A. I don't -- I couldn't tell you that. 25 Q. Okay.
Deposition Resources, Inc. 800.295.4109 Electronically signed by Terri Lynn Smith (601-237-608-4107) 16a5ed0!-8516-4c02-81 cc-9c8298!78b4c Page 42 1 was mean. -
2 Q. Okay. Had that dog bitten people before? Do
3 you know if it had?
4 A. I -- I don't know.
5 Q. Okay. But they would even put it up when
6 people they knew, sort of some of these regular group
8 Q. -- were over?
9 A. Yes.
10 Q. Okay. After the dog nipped at you, were --
11 when you would go __:_ after that, when you would go back
12 to the Davidsons, were the dogs still out when you'd go
13 back on other occasions? ( 14 A. Yes.
15 Q. Okay. And you didn't have any more problems
16 with Bubba after that?
17 A. No.
18 Q. Okay. Why do you think he nipped that -- that
19 particular time?
20 A. I think that I had -- I don't know. I'm going
21 to say scared him because I was running towards the
22 door, you know. I don't know if it was a surprise thing
23 or what, but he didn't like me running towards the door,
24 so . ...
25 Q. Okay. Had -- had you come through the living
Deposition Resources, Inc. 800.295.4109 Electronically signed by Terri Lynn Smfth (601-237-608-4107) 16a5ed0f-8516-4c02-81 cc-9c8298f78 b4c Page 45 1 p.m. 2 (Break from 5:17p.m. to 5:19p.m.) 3 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We're back on the 4 record at 5:19 p.m. 5 EXAMINATION 6 BY MR. SANDERS: 7 Q. Mr. Strong, my name's Jack Sanders, and I 8 represent Ms. Bowman. And to clarify, I came to see 9 you, and you told me what happened, I wrote it down, and 10 then you made some corrections, I think, where you 11 initialed it and you signed that; is that correct? 12 A. Yes. 13 Q. Your statement. We're talking about No. -- r, 14 A. That 4 . 15 Q. -- No. 4? 16 A. Yes. 17 Q. All right, sir. Now, I have previously taken 18 the deposition of Mrs. Davidson this morning, and we've 19 talked about the bite that's mentioned there in Exhibit 20 No. 4, and she says that she witnessed that -- that 21 bite. Is that your recollection -- 22 A. Yes. 23 Q. -- when the dog attacked you -- or bit you? 24 A. Yes. 25 Q. And I believe she described it as she had to
Deposition Resources, Inc. 800.295.4109 Electronically signed by Terri Lynn Smith (601-237-608-4107) 16a5ed0f-B516-4c02-B1 cc-9c829Bf7B b4c Page 46 1 call the dog off, he had ahold of your pants leg and
2 wouldn't let go and was shaking. Do you recall that?
3 A. No.
4 Q. All right. You just don't recall it, but you
5 don't --
6 A. No. I know that's not what happened.
7 Q. Okay. What happened?
8 A. The dog ran and he nipped me on the leg and
9 that was it. He let it go.
10 Q. Okay. But it was enough bite to cause a
11 bruise? 12 A. Yes.
13 Q. Okay. Now, then, how long was it -- you said ( 14 that the dogs -- excuse me. You said that the Davidsons
15 had a blue heeler before Bubba that was just plain mean,
16 as I think you've described it; is that correct?
17 A. Yes. 18 Q. How long was it from when they had the dog that
19 was mean, was it -- did he agress -- did did the dog
20 progressively get mean as he got older? 21 A. That dog was old whenever I came around them,
22 when I met them. 23 Q. Okay.
24 A. It was already-- had been there, so ....
25 Q. Do you know whether or not dogs, as they get
Deposition Resources, Inc. 800.295.4109 Electronically signed by Terri Lynn Smith (601·237-608-4107) 16a5ed0f·B516·4c02·81 cc-9c829Bf7Bb4c Page 48 1 A. I don't recall.
2 Q. All right. Could it -- this leaning, could it
3 very well have been that Ms. Bowman reached over to say
4 something to Ms. Davidson?
5 A. I -- I don't know·.
6 Q. Okay. Or it could have been -- it wasn't that
7 Ms. or was i t that Ms. Bowman reached down in the
8 face of the dog, or was it just that Ms. Bowman leaned
9 to the right toward Ms. Ms. Davidson?
10 A. I -- I don't --
11 Q. You don't know?
12 A. I don't know the r·eason.
13 Q. All right. ( 14 A. No, I don't.
15 Q. But was it like the dog had to leave its feet
16 to hit her -- to be able the grab her in the face?
17 A. As in
18 Q. Well, here.
19 A. Are you talking about jump or just whack, you
20 know, because that's --
21 Q. No. Did the dog have to leap any to be able to
22 get her in the face?
23 A. No.
24 Q. Okay. How tall is the dog?
25 A. The dog's about about this tall.
Deposition Resources, Inc. 800.295.4109 Electronically signed by Terri Lynn Smith (601·237·608-4107) 16a5ed0f·8516-4c02-81 cc-9c829817 8b4c Page 53 1 doing?
2 A. I don't know.
3 Q. Okay.
4 A. I don't know if she was just eating or -- I
5 couldn't -- I don't -- I don't know.
6 Q. All right. And did you hear Ms. Davidson make
7 any statements to Ms. Bowman right before the attack?
8 A. I don't recall that.
9 Q. All right. Has anyone else told you that they
10 saw the attack?
12 Q. All right. And I'm told that --well, Mr.
13 Davidson stated that he warned Ms. Bowman and, ( 14 therefore, he wasn't liable that -- well, let me ask you
15 this: Do you think that the warn-- that Mrs. -- if Ms.
16 Bowman failed to heed the warnings, that was the cause
17 of this attack?
19 Q. How is that?
20 A. Well, if she was warned, like then went ahead
21 and did it anyway, then, you know ....
22 Q. . But you don't know --
23 A. I don't know that she was warned. Okay? I
24 just know that's the way it always has been before,
25 so ....
Deposition Resources, Inc. 800.295.4109 Electronically signed by Terri Lynn Smith (601-237-6084107) 16a5ed0f-8516-4c02-81 cc-9c8298f78b4c Page 54 1 Q. And you don't know whether she was leaning down
2 to look at the dog or whether she was leaning over to
3 talk to Ms. Davidson either?
4 A. No. I have no idea about that.
5 Q. Could be either one, from what you saw?
6 A. Yes.
7 Q. And has there ever been an occasion that --
8 strike that.
9 Has the dog ever come up for you to pet
10 him?
12 Q. And did you pet him?
13 A. Yes. ( 14 Q. Okay. You weren't scared to pet him?
15 A- No.
16 Q. Why is that? Because you were raised around
17 him?
19 Q. Or vice versa?
20 A. Yes. He'll -- he meets me when I come. You
21 can hear him hollering and here he comes. And he -- I
22 say I get Bubbatized because he leaps on me.
23 Q. Well --
24 A. Not bite me. Just leaps on me and, boom, you
25 know. Yeah. He likes to see me come.
Deposition Resources, Inc. 800.295.4109 Electronically signed by Terri Lynn Smith (601-237-608-4107) 16a5ed0f-8516-4c02-81 cc-9c8 298f78b4c Page 55 1 Q. Is it fair -- is it fair to say at times Bubba
2 can be·ill-tempered?
3 A. I would say so, yes.
4 Q. All right. And he's, at times, exhibited
5 dangerous characteristics?
6 A. Well, he has with Ms. Bowman, yes.
7 Q. Before that he attacked you, did he not?
8 A. . Well --
9 Q. Attacked your leg or bit your leg?
10 A. Yeah. He nipped my leg.
11 Q. All right. And do you know what Mrs.
12 Davidson's reaction to that was? Did she
13 A. Yes. She scolded the dog and .... (' 14 Q. Scolded him?
15 A. Yeah. She scolded him.
16 MR. SANDERS: We're going to change tapes
17 here.
18 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: End of Tape 1. Off
19 the record, 5:32 p.m.
20 (Break, 5:32p.m. to 5:34p.m.)
21 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Beginning of Tape 2.
22 Back on the record, 5:34 p.m.
23 Q. (By Mr. Sanders) Now, back to two things.
24 One, the prior dog that was just -~ I think you said he
25 was mean and they put him up. Did they were you
Deposition Resources, Inc. 800.295.4109 Electronically signed by Terri Lynn Smith (601·237·608-4107) 16a5ed0f-8516-4c02-81 cc-9 c8298178 b4c Page 60 1 would have happened?
3 Q. Right. Okay. But that evening do you recall
4 any anybody raising any concern or the issue of
5 putting the dog up that particular evening?
6 A. No. I don't -- I don't recall them saying put
7 the dog up.
8 Q. And you observed nothing that you felt like
9 would have put anyone on notice that, Hey, we better put
10 the dog up because he's acting a certain way tonight?
12 Q. . Okay. And the dog's been out there a lot of
13 times when you've been over there since this happened, ( 14 right?
16 Q. And you've never asked them to put the dog up
17 when you've been over there, have you?
19 Q. Okay. .. You haven't been concerned that he's
20 going to bite you again or anything?
21 A. No.
22 Q. Okay. I mean, he could, right?
23 A. Yeah. He could, but --
24 Q. Okay. In other words, that's like what you
25 said earlier about saying the dog's dangerous. Once he
Deposition Resources, Inc. 800.295.4109 Electronically signed by Terri Lynn Smith (601-237-6084107) 16a5ed0f-85164c02-81 cc-9c6298f76b4c Page 61 1 bit you, obviously he bit at you, he might bite somebody 2 else, right? 3 A. Yes. 4 Q. Okay. But you're still around the dog fairly 5 frequently and have no real concerns about him attacking 6 or biting you? 7 A. No. When Diana and Jerry leave to go -- or if 8 they're going to go out of town, they call me, and I go 9 over there and let the dogs out and all that stuff, so 10 it's .... 11 Q. Okay. 12 A. I have no concern about him biting me. 13 Q. So the am I correct that the only real thing ( 14 that sort of changed since Ms. Bowman has been bitten is 15 that now when new people or guests come over, they -- 16 they put the dog up? 17 A. Yes. 18 Q. Because of what now has happened? 19 A. Yes. 20 MR. BROWN: Okay. All right. Okay. 21 Thank you I pass the witness. 22 (Examination concluded at 5:40p.m.) 23 EXAMINATION 24 BY MR. SANDERS: 25 Q. You say that on that particular night there was
Deposition Resources, Inc. 800.295.4109 Electronically signed by Terri Lynn Smith {601-237-608-4107) 16a5ed0f-8516-4c02-81 cc-9c829Bf7Bb4c Page 62 1 no -- no sense of their dog acting any different than he ( 2 normally does; is that correct?
3 A. Correct.
4 Q. All right. But that night there were the
5 warnings there, the same warnings that they always give
6 because the dog has this dangerous propensity to attack
7 because of the possessiveness and -- not possessiveness,
8 protectiveness and aggression. Is that a fair
9 statement?
11 Q. That danger that -- the warnings and rules and
12 regulations that were told to Ms. Bowman, that danger
13 remains regardless of the actions of the dog or
14 nonactions of the dog, correct?
16 Q. And i t was just a -- in your opinion, was it
17 just a matter of time before this happened?
18 A. I don't know. I wouldn't have thought that
19 that would have happened like that anyway, but ....
20 Q. But that was the reason for the warnings? 21. A. Yes.
22 Q. What happened to the dog that you claim was
23 just mean? Did he die of old age or
24 A. I think -- I think it was a female, and I think
25 she just died of old age. That was quite a few years
Deposition Resources, Inc. 800.295.4109 Electronically signed by Terri Lynn Smith (601-237·608-4107) 16a5ed Of·8516-4c02-81 cc-9c829Bf78b4c Page 64
1 CAUSE NO. 13-0618 i \ 2 NANCY ELIZABETH BOWMAN, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff, 3 vs. HARRISON COUNTY, TEXAS 4 JERRY DAVIDSON AND 5 DIANA DAVIDSON, Defendants. 71ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT 6
7 REPORTER'S CERTIFICATION DEPOSITION OF BILLY STRONG 8 NOVEMBER 18, 2012 9 I, TERRI LYNN SMITH, Certified Shorthand 10 Reporter in and for the State of Texas, hereby certify '11 to the following:
12 That the witness, BILLY STRONG, was duly sworn
13 by the officer and that the transcript of the oral
14 deposition is a true record of the testimony given by
15 the witness;
16 That examination and signature of the witness 17 to the deposition transcript was waived by the witness
18 and agreement of the parties at the time of the
19 deposition;
20 That the original deposition was delivered to
21 Mr. Alan E. Brown;
22 That the amount of time used by each party at
23 the deposition is as follows:
24 Mr. Jack Sanders, Jr. - 00 hours, 20 minutes
25 Mr. Alan E. Brown - 00 hours, 45 minutes (
Deposition Resources, Inc. 800.295.4109 Electronically signed by Terri Lynn Smith (601-237-608-4107) 16a5edOf-8516-4c02-81 cc-9c8298f78 b4c Page 65
1 That $ d-q] ·00 is the deposition officer's 2 charges to the Defendant for preparing the original 3 deposition transcript and any copies of exhibits; 4 That pursuant to information given to the 5 deposition officer·at the time said testimony was taken, 6 the following includes all parties of record: 7 Mr. Jack Sanders, Jr., Attorney for Plaintiff, Nancy Elizabeth Bowman; 8 Mr. Alan E. Brown, Attorney for Defendants, 9 Jerry Davidson and Diana Davidson. 10 That a copy of this certificate was served on 11 all parties shown herein on ~ and filed with the 12 Clerk pursuant to Rule 203.3. 13 I further certify that I am neither counsel \, 14 for, related to, nor employed by any of the parties or 15 attorneys in the action in which this proceeding was .16 taken, and further that I am not financially or 17 otherwise interested in the outcome of the action. 18 Certified on this the 25th day of November, 19 2013. 20
21 TE 22 Expiration Deposition Resources, Inc. 23 Firm Registration No.: 409 515 North Church Street 24 Palestine, Texas 75801 Telephone: (903) 729-3289 25 Facsimile: (903) 727-0986 I.
Deposition Resomces, Inc. 800.295.4109 Electronically signed by Terri Lynn Smith (601·237·608·4107) 16a5ed0f·8516-4c02·81 cc-9c8298f78b4c 1 BRUCE BRADLEY, D.V.M. - 3/13/2014
1 NO. 13-0618 2 NANCY ELIZABETH BOWMAN § IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, § 3 § v. § 71ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT 4 § JERRY DAVIDSON and § 5 DIANA DAVIDSON § Defendants. § OF HARRISON COUNTY, TEXAS 6 7 8 9 10 VIDEOTAPED/ORAL DEPOSITION OF BRUCE BRADLEY, D.V.M. 11 MARCH 13, 2014 12 13 14 15 VIDEOTAPED/ORAL DEPOSITION OF BRUCE BRADLEY, 16 D.V.M., produced as a witness at the instance of the 17 Plaintiff, and duly sworn, was taken in the 18 above-styled and -numbered cause on the 13th day of 19 March, 2014, from 4:21p.m. until 4:50p.m., before 20 Amanda J. Leigh, certified Shorthand Reporter in and 21 for the State of Texas, reported by machine shorthand, 22 at the Law Office of Jack Sanders, Jr., 109 East 23 Houston, Marshall, Texas 75671, pursuant to the Texas 24 Rules of civil Procedure and the agreement(s) 25 hereinafter set forth, if any.
LEIGH & ASS EXHIBIT ~~RTING AND VIDEO (877) 7 ~ o77) 790-3377 i 2 BRUCE BRADLEY, D.V.M. - 3/13/2014
1 AP P EARA NC E S 2 FOR THE PLAINTIFF: 3 4 Jack sanders, Jr., Esq. LAW OFFICE OF JACK SANDERS, JR. 5 109 East Houston Marshall, Texas 75670 6 Telephone: 903-925-7172 7 FOR THE DEFENDANTS: 8 9 Alan E. Brown, Esq. BOYD & BROWN, P.C. 10 1215 Pruitt Place Tyler Texas 75703 11 Telephone: 903-526-9000· 12 13 ALSO PRESENT: 14 Mr. Dart Leigh, videographer 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
LEIGH & ASSOCIATES COURT REPORTING AND VIDEO (877) 790-3376 FAX (877) 790-3377 3 BRUCE BRADLEY, D.V.M. - 3/13/2014
1 INDEX 2 WITNESS: BRUCE BRADLEY, D.V.M. 3 4 Exam1nat1on by Mr. sanders ....................... . 4 Exam1nat1on by Mr. Brown ......................... . 16 5 Further Examination by Mr. sanders •............... 26 Further Examination by Mr. Brown ..........•....... 29 6 7 Changes and si9nature ............................ . 34 court Reporter s certificates .................... . 36 8 9 (No exhibits marked.) 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
LEIGH & ASSOCIATES COURT REPORTING AND VIDEO (877) 790-3376 FAX (877) 790-3377 15 BRUCE BRADLEY, D.V.M. - 3/13/2014
1 A. Yes. 2 Q. And are you going to refer to Dr. Haug as to 3 whether Bubba has any propensities to be dangerous -- 4 A. Yes 5 Q. or -- 6 A. I would, because there's two things about 7 it is, is that -- an animal in my office does not 8 always act like that's the same animal at home, and 9 that can go either way. They can be docile at home and 10 vicious in my office or vice versa. 11 Q. There again, the owner of the dog is the 12 best-qualified person to know what that dog's behavior 13 is going to be in a certain situation. Is that 14 correct? 15 A. That would be my opinion. 16 Q. All right. 17 And if a dog, in your opinion, has shown 18 aggressive tendencies at one time, what should the -- 19 in your opinion, the land -- the home -- the dog owner 20 .do in regard to that dog showing those aggressive 21 tendencies? 22 A. In my opinion, you know, if somebody has an 23 aggressive dog--and just -- and this'd just be me--that 24 I would be sure, if I was going to have people over, 25 I'd probably put the dog up, away from the people,
LEIGH & ASSOCIATES COURT REPORTING AND VIDEO (877) 790-3376 FAX (877) 790-3377 16 BRUCE BRADLEY, D.V.M. - 3/13/2014
1 yeah. 2 Q. All right, sir. 3 what about never mind. strike that. 4 MR. SANDERS: I -- I pass the witness. 5 EXAMINATION 6 BY MR. BROWN: 7 Q. okay. Dr. Bradley, I'm Alan Brown. You and 8 I have met before. I came up to your office -- 9 A. Yep. 10 Q. -- a month or so ago, I guess, now -- 11 A. Yeah. 12 Q. -- and just chatted with you a little bit 13 about -- 14 A. Yes. 15 Q. this case. 16 Now, you've been asked some questions 17 about the plaintiff's expert, the person they've hired 18 to give opinions, Dr. Haug. Do you know whether or not 19 Dr. Haug has ever been around this particular dog, 20 around Bubba? 21 A. No, I do not know. 22 Q. okay. so as between her and yourself, if she 23 has not, then, obviously, you have some perspective 24 that she would not have because you've actually 25 treated, been around, handled this dog, correct?
LEIGH & ASSOCIATES COURT REPORTING AND VIDEO (877) 790-3376 FAX (877) 790-3377 17 BRUCE BRADLEY, D.V.M. - 3/13/2014
1 A. correct. 2 Q. okay. 3 And I think you -- I think -- 4 Mr. sanders just asked you a question that I was 5 wanting to ask, and I want to make sure that's what he 6 said and you agreed to it, and that is that that the 7 best person to really know the character or the 8 behavior of a dog in terms of how they act in certain 9 locations or in certain situations, such as just the 10 family versus a big group, all of that, t.he best person 11 that would know that dog would be the owner of that 12 dog. Is that correct? 13 A. I would think so. Just like I told 14 Mr. sanders, yes, that they're around the dog most the 15 time, so normally they know the -- the behavior of the 16 dog in all situations. 17 Q. okay. And I think -- again, I think it's not 18 contested, that Bubba, he's about 11 or 12 years old, 19 and that the Davidsons got him and the other--I think 20 it's his sister, the other dog they have--at the same 21 time and that these dogs have lived in the home with 22 the Davidsons ever since they were puppies. 23 It -- did you have that understanding 24 before you came today, that they were -- they've been 25 raised all their lives by the Davidsons and --
LEIGH & ASSOCIATES COURT REPORTING AND VIDEO (877) 790-3376 FAX (877) 790-3377 21 BRUCE BRADLEY, D.V.M. - 3/13/2014
1 that I -- you know, they -- they shouldn't. And I'm 2 not going to say some of them but most heelers I 3 see, no. They might nip at a a cow or a horse, but 4 they don't nip at people. 5 Q. Okay. Again, that goes to the level of 6 training 7 A. That goes -- yes. 8 Q. So they may have the natural tendency to want 9 to have that herding instinct. 10 A. Well -- 11 Q. correct? 12 A. -- I would -- yes. 13 Q. And so then it may simply be a level of 14 training, as to, okay, it's okay to go nip our cows out 15 here, but don't herd the people. correct? 16 A. In my opinion. 17 Q. okay. 18 A. That's just my opinion. Again, like I say, 19 here's the experts over here that can -- 20 Q. okay. 21 A. --that can go further, so .... 22 Q. Now, let -- you -- I think when we visited, 23 you told me your last recollection of seeing Bubba--I 24 think you were looking at the records-- 25 A. Yep.
LEIGH & ASSOCIATES COURT REPORTING AND VIDEO (877) 790-3376 FAX (877) 790-3377 22 BRUCE BRADLEY, D.V.M. - 3/13/2014
1 Q. --you had given him a shot of some kind. 2 A. I'd pulled blood. I'd -- 3 Q. Pulled -- 4 A. taken -- 5 Q. blood. 6 A. a blood sample. 7 Q. okay. 8 And you told me that a matter of weeks 9 or something before that -- 10 A. Yeah. 11 Q. -- you had gone through some health issues, 12 yourself. Heart -- was it a heart 13 A. Open heart surgery. 14 Q. surgery. 15 A. That's right. 16 And I told you if the dog would have 17 been aggressive that day, I would not have pulled 18 blood, because I was about -- my chest was still not 19 healed. I mean, the surgery's done on september the 20 29th and I think these records show it was November the 21 11th or somewhere in early November, so -- 22 Q. okay. so 23 A. yes 24 Q. if he was giving you any concerns, you 25 wouldn't have been drawing blood from him.
LEIGH & ASSOCIATES COURT REPORTING AND VIDEO (877) 790-3376 FAX (877) 790-3377 23 BRUCE BRADLEY, D.V.M. - 3/13/2014
1 A. That -- that is correct. 2 Q. okay. 3 Do you have -- from the times that you 4 have seen Bubba, treated him, do you have any 5 recollection or is there anything in your records that 6 you've seen that indicates that he was aggressive 7 towards you or threatening towards you or anyone else? 8 A. No. There's nothing in the records to that 9 effect. 10 Q. And do you have any memory of anything like 11 that? 12 A. No. ( 13 Q. okay. 14 If Bubba -- if the facts are such that 15 the only thing that Bubba had ever done that would be 16 considered aggressive or a bite or attacking, or 17 anything like that, was the incident where he went 18 after Billy Strong and got him on the back of the heel, 19 the leg, if that was the only -- if that, in fact, is 20 the only incident of aggression by this dog--all of his 21 other activity has not shown aggression, he hadn't 22 bitten anybody else, he -- he's always out when they 23 have generally out when they have groups of friends 24 over at the house--if those are the facts, do you 25 believe that the Davidsons would be the best ones to
LEIGH & ASSOCIATES COURT REPORTING AND VIDEO (877) 790-3376 FAX (877) 790-3377 29 BRUCE BRADLEY, D.V.M. - 3/13/2014 ( 1 at what point they are to take responsibility for their 2 dog. 3 A. As I said earlier, I think that if I have"a 4 dog or you have a dog, that the responsibility's always 5 ultimately upon you. I mean, that is my thought, if 6 common sense counts, but -- 7 Q. All right. Don't leave it to somebody else. 8 (Reporter clarification.) 9 MR. SANDERS: I don't think he did. 10 I'll pass the witness. 11 FURTHER EXAMINATION 12 BY MR. BROWN: 13 Q. That last time you saw Bubba and you gave him 14 the shot 15 A. Yep. 16 Q. -- do you remember him being muzzled that 17 day? 18 A. I do not remember it. 19 Q. okay. Because my memory of when I met with 20 you was that you made the comment that -- that in 21 giving him a shot, where -- where do you give him the 22 shot? 23 A. oh, well, we're pulling out of his-- out of 24 his forward leg. 25 Q. okay, front -- one of his front legs.
LEIGH & ASSOCIATES COURT REPORTING AND VIDEO (877) 790-3376 FAX (877) 790-3377 30 BRUCE BRADLEY, D.V.M. - 3/13/2014
1 A. One of his front legs. 2 Q. And I think you told me when you do that, 3 you're not far from his mouth. 4 A. That is true. 5 Q. okay. 6 And I think you told me that if you had 7 had any concerns about that dog, you wouldn't have been 8 doing that. Do you remember telling -- 9 A. I 10 Q. me 11 A. did. 12 Q., something -- okay. 13 A. Yes, I did. said that day, if -- if I -- I 14 had been out of surgery not long. If I'd had any 15 concerns, that that I would not have done it. 16 Q. And, of course, if the dog had been muzzled, 17 he obviously couldn't have bitten you. 18 A. No, he couldn't have bitten me. 19 Q. He still might have jumped or something 20 A. He still could have jumped, though -- 21 Q. Okay -- 22 A. is what I'm -- 23 Q. okay. 24 A. saying. 25 Q. All right.
LEIGH & ASSOCIATES COURT REPORTING AND VIDEO (877) 790-3376 FAX (877) 790-3377 34 BRUCE BRADLEY, D.V.M. - 3/13/2014 ( 1 NO. 13-0618 2 NANCY ELIZABETH BOWMAN § IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, § 3 § v. § 71ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT 4 § JERRY DAVIDSON and § 5 DIANA DAVIDSON § Defendants. § OF HARRISON COUNTY, TEXAS 6 REPORTER'S CERTIFICATE TO THE 7 VIDEOTAPED/ORAL DEPOSITION OF BRUCE BRADLEY, D.V.M. . MARCH 13, 2014 8 9 I, Amanda J. Leigh, certified shorthand Reporter 10 in and for the state of Texas, hereby certify: 11 That the witness, BRUCE BRADLEY, D.V.M., was duly 12 sworn and that the transcript of the deposition'is a 13 true record of the testimony given by the witness; 14 That witness waived signature; 15 That $525.50 is the deposition officer's charges 16 to counsel for the Plaintiff, for preparing the 17 original deposition and any copies of exhibits; 18 That pursuant to information given to the 19 deposition officer at the time said testimony was 20 taken, the following includes all. parties of record 21 and the amount of time used by each party at the time 22 of the deposition: 23 24 25
LEIGH & ASSOCIATES COURT REPORTING AND VIDEO (877) 790-3376 FAX (877) 790-3377
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Nancy Elizabeth Bowman v. Jerry Davidson and Diana Davidson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nancy-elizabeth-bowman-v-jerry-davidson-and-diana-davidson-texapp-2015.