Nancy C. v. Roman U.

222 A.D.2d 240, 635 N.Y.S.2d 20, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12702
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 7, 1995·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Order, Family Court, New York County (Leah Marks, J.), entered on or about September 24, 1993, which, inter alia, denied respondent’s objection to the Hearing Examiner’s order denying his application for a downward modification of child support, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondent’s failure to appear before the Hearing Examiner made inquiry into his financial means impossible, and justified [241] a support order based on the mother’s testimony as to the child’s needs (Family Ct Act § 413 [1] [k]; § 545). Respondent’s subsequent failure to substantiate his expenses and document his income and assets justified adherence to the support order that was granted on his default. We have considered respondent’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Ross and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nancy C. v. Roman U., 222 A.D.2d 240, 635 N.Y.S.2d 20, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12702 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

222 A.D.2d 240 (Nancy C. v. Roman U.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DeSanctis v. Macaluso
20 A.D.3d 528 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)