Nance v. State

674 So. 2d 888, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5535, 1996 WL 281499
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 29, 1996·No. No. 95-02756·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Louis Nance, challenges the two-year suspension of his driver’s license. We only find merit in his argument that the trial court erred in directly suspending his license, and we reverse.

Nance entered a no contest plea to acquiring a controlled substance by fraud. He argues, and the state correctly concedes, that the trial court erred in directly suspending his license for two years. The proper procedure pursuant to section 322.055, Florida Statutes (1993), is for the trial court to direct the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles to revoke the driver’s license. Vinyard, v. State, 586 So.2d 1301 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

Accordingly, that portion of Nance’s sentence revoking his driver’s license is reversed, and the case is remanded for the trial court to direct the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles to revoke his license. Nance’s judgment and sentence are otherwise affirmed.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and BLUE and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nance v. State, 674 So. 2d 888, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5535, 1996 WL 281499 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

674 So. 2d 888 (Nance v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vinyard v. State
586 So. 2d 1301 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)