Nance v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Nance v. State

674 So. 2d 888, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5535, 1996 WL 281499

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 29, 1996

DocketNo. 95-02756

StatusPublished

This text of 674 So. 2d 888 (Nance v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nance v. State, 674 So. 2d 888, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5535, 1996 WL 281499 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Louis Nance, challenges the two-year suspension of his driver’s license. We only find merit in his argument that the trial court erred in directly suspending his license, and we reverse.

Nance entered a no contest plea to acquiring a controlled substance by fraud. He argues, and the state correctly concedes, that the trial court erred in directly suspending his license for two years. The proper procedure pursuant to section 322.055, Florida Statutes (1993), is for the trial court to direct the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles to revoke the driver’s license. Vinyard, v. State, 586 So.2d 1301 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

Accordingly, that portion of Nance’s sentence revoking his driver’s license is reversed, and the case is remanded for the trial court to direct the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles to revoke his license. Nance’s judgment and sentence are otherwise affirmed.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and BLUE and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI