Nance v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Nance v. State

453 So. 2d 761, 1984 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 5108

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

DecidedMay 8, 1984

Docket8 Div. 4

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 453 So. 2d 761 (Nance v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nance v. State, 453 So. 2d 761, 1984 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 5108 (Ala. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

BOWEN, Presiding Judge.

It affirmatively appearing that the appellant’s probation was revoked and that she was not given “[a] written statement by the judge as to the evidence relied on and reasons for revoking probation”, as required by Armstrong v. State, 294 Ala. 100, 103, 312 So.2d 620 (1975), this cause is remanded with directions that the requirements and guidelines set forth in Armstrong be satisfied.

REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

All Judges concur.

ON RETURN TO REMAND

The return to remand shows that the appellant’s probation revocation was in full compliance with Armstrong, supra. Therefore, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

OPINION EXTENDED;

AFFIRMED.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BOWEN, Presiding Judge.

It affirmatively appearing that the appellant’s probation was revoked and that she was not given “[a] written statement by the judge as to the evidence relied on and reasons for revoking probation”, as required by Armstrong v. State, 294 Ala. 100, 103, 312 So.2d 620 (1975), this cause is remanded with directions that the requirements and guidelines set forth in Armstrong be satisfied.

REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

All Judges concur.

ON RETURN TO REMAND

The return to remand shows that the appellant’s probation revocation was in full compliance with Armstrong, supra. Therefore, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

OPINION EXTENDED;

AFFIRMED.

All Judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

453 So. 2d 761, 1984 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 5108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nance-v-state-alacrimapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack