Nance v. . Hulin

148 S.E. 38, 197 N.C. 222, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 196
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided May 15, 1929·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The evidence presents an issue of fact and no more. No reversible error is pointed out, and the burden to show such error is upon the appellant.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nance v. . Hulin, 148 S.E. 38, 197 N.C. 222, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 196 (N.C. 1929).

148 S.E. 38 (Nance v. . Hulin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hertford Banking Co. v. Stokes
29 S.E.2d 24 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1944)
Brown Ex Rel. Webb v. Wood
160 S.E. 281 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)