Nanakumo v. Gregory

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nanakumo v. Gregory

29 A.D.3d 754, 813 N.Y.S.2d 915

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 16, 2006

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 29 A.D.3d 754 (Nanakumo v. Gregory) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nanakumo v. Gregory, 29 A.D.3d 754, 813 N.Y.S.2d 915 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to set aside a sale of an interest in a cooperative apartment, and, in effect, to vacate a judgment of possession of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Housing Part, Kings County, dated June 30, 2004, and a warrant of eviction, dated December 28, 2004, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Douglass, J.), dated January 31, 2005, which, sua sponte, directed dismissal of the complaint.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies as of right from an order that does not decide a motion made on notice, and we decline to grant leave to appeal (see CPLR 5701 [a] [2]; Sholes v Meagher, 100 NY2d 333, 335 [2003]; French v French, 12 AD3d 484 [2004]). Florio, J.P., Crane, Goldstein and Spolzino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to set aside a sale of an interest in a cooperative apartment, and, in effect, to vacate a judgment of possession of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Housing Part, Kings County, dated June 30, 2004, and a warrant of eviction, dated December 28, 2004, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Douglass, J.), dated January 31, 2005, which, sua sponte, directed dismissal of the complaint.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies as of right from an order that does not decide a motion made on notice, and we decline to grant leave to appeal (see CPLR 5701 [a] [2]; Sholes v Meagher, 100 NY2d 333, 335 [2003]; French v French, 12 AD3d 484 [2004]). Florio, J.P., Crane, Goldstein and Spolzino, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 A.D.3d 754, 813 N.Y.S.2d 915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nanakumo-v-gregory-nyappdiv-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack