Nan S. Vick v. Foote, Incorporated, T/a Foote Tire
This text of 82 F.3d 411 (Nan S. Vick v. Foote, Incorporated, T/a Foote Tire) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
82 F.3d 411
74 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1792
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Nan S. VICK, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
FOOTE, INCORPORATED, t/a Foote Tire, Defendant--Appellee.
No. 95-2486.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 30, 1995.
Decided April 12, 1996.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-95-151).
Nan S. Vick, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Patrick Geary, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and HAMILTON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on her civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Vick v. Foote, Inc., No. CA-95-151 (E.D.Va. Aug. 1, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
82 F.3d 411, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 21115, 74 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1792, 1996 WL 174605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nan-s-vick-v-foote-incorporated-ta-foote-tire-ca4-1996.