Namur v. State

561 So. 2d 472, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3869, 1990 WL 70506
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 29, 1990·No. No. 89-1876·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 92 S.Ct. 2182, 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972); Brown v. State, 428 So.2d 250 (Fla.), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1209, 103 S.Ct. 3541, 77 L.Ed.2d 1391 (1983); Dodd v. State, 537 So.2d 626 (Fla.3d DCA 1988); Wale v. State, 397 So.2d 738 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Hively v. State, 336 So.2d 127 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Namur v. State, 561 So. 2d 472, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3869, 1990 WL 70506 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

561 So. 2d 472 (Namur v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barker v. Wingo
407 U.S. 514 (Supreme Court, 1972)
Dodd v. State
537 So. 2d 626 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Wale v. State
397 So. 2d 738 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Brown v. State
428 So. 2d 250 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)
Hively v. State
336 So. 2d 127 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)