Nampiaparampil v. The New York City Campaign Finance Board

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DEVI ELIZABETH NAMPIAPARAMPIL, Plaintiff, — against — THE NEW YORK CITY CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDER BOARD, CITY OF NEW YORK, DAVID ; 23-cv- 1 (ER DUHALDE, HANNAH EGERTON, AMY $ev-06391 (ER) LOPREST, BETHANY PERSKIE, FREDERICK SCHAFFER, MATTHEW SOLLARS, and JACLYN WILLIAMS, Defendants.

Ramos, D.J.: Defendants’ request to stay discovery, Doc. 68, is GRANTED. Defendants’ motion presents substantial arguments for dismissal, and a stay would not unfairly prejudice Nampiaparampil. See, e.g., HAHA Glob., Inc. v. Barclays, No. 19 Civ. 04749 (VEC) (SDA), 2020 WL 832341, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 20, 2020). Accordingly, discovery in this matter shall be stayed pending resolution of Defendants’ motion to dismiss. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion, Doc. 68.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 28, 2024 720% New York, New York a \o— EDGARDO RAMOS, U.S.D.J.