Namiki v. ICT Law & Tech. Grp., PLLC
This text of 421 P.3d 460 (Namiki v. ICT Law & Tech. Grp., PLLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Johnson, Owens, Wiggins and Gordon McCloud, considered at its July 10, 2018, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.
¶ 1 IT IS ORDERED:
¶ 1 That the petition for review is denied. Pursuant to RAP 18.9, the Petitioners are ordered to pay sanctions for filing a frivolous petition for review. The sanctions shall be paid to the Respondent and shall be the amount of the reasonable attorney fees and expenses incurred in filing an answer to the petition for review. The amount of the attorney fees and expenses will be determined by the Supreme Court Clerk pursuant to RAP 18.1. Pursuant to RAP 18.1(d), the Respondent should file an affidavit with the Clerk of the Washington State Supreme Court.
¶ 1 For the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
421 P.3d 460, 190 Wash. 2d 1032, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/namiki-v-ict-law-tech-grp-pllc-wash-2018.