Named Individual Members of the San Antonio Conservation Society v. The Texas Highway Department

519 F.2d 1372, 5 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 25, 1975
Docket74-1231
StatusPublished

This text of 519 F.2d 1372 (Named Individual Members of the San Antonio Conservation Society v. The Texas Highway Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Named Individual Members of the San Antonio Conservation Society v. The Texas Highway Department, 519 F.2d 1372, 5 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20 (5th Cir. 1975).

Opinion

519 F.2d 1372

5 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,666

NAMED INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF the SAN ANTONIO CONSERVATION
SOCIETY et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
The TEXAS HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 74-1231.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 25, 1975.

John W. Vardaman, Jr., Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs-appellants.

William S. Sessions, U. S. Atty., Edward M. Johnson, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., Larry F. York, Lynn Taylor, Asst. Attys. Gen., Samuel D. McDaniel, Chas. Alan Wright, Austin, Tex., Leonard Schaitman, Judith S. Feigin, Dept. of Justice, Appellate Sec., Civil Div., Washington, D. C., for defendants-appellees.

Hubert W. Green, San Antonio, Tex., amicus curiae for Greater San Antonio Chamber of Commerce.

Crawford B. Reeder, City Atty., San Antonio, Tex., amicus curiae for City of San Antonio.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas; Jack Roberts, Judge.

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and TUTTLE, WISDOM, GEWIN, BELL, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, DYER, SIMPSON, MORGAN, CLARK, RONEY and GEE, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

The decision of the District Court which rejected the claim of plaintiffs for attorneys' fees in this case is affirmed on the basis of the recent decision of the Supreme Court in Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society et al., --- U.S. ---, 95 S.Ct. 1612, 44 L.Ed.2d 141 (1975).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society
421 U.S. 240 (Supreme Court, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
519 F.2d 1372, 5 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/named-individual-members-of-the-san-antonio-conservation-society-v-the-ca5-1975.