Nalls v. Plattsmiere

394 F. App'x 90
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 1, 2010·No. No. 10-30351·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The request to recuse is rejected. No conflict of interest exists and appellant complains only of action consistent with the judicial duties of this court.

Appellant has failed to state a viable complaint. His problem is only with the exercise of the disciplinary responsibility of the defendants. As the district court has correctly explained, absolute prosecu-torial and judicial immunity bar this action.

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nalls v. Plattsmiere, 394 F. App'x 90 (5th Cir. 2010).

394 F. App'x 90 (Nalls v. Plattsmiere) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Price v. Irons
E.D. Louisiana, 2020
Nalls v. Plattsmiere
179 L. Ed. 2d 656 (Supreme Court, 2011)