Nalley v. Nalley

411 So. 2d 275, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19452
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Nalley v. Nalley. Read the opinion of the Court — 406 So. 2d 1240
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 11, 1982·No. No. WW-322·Published

Opinions

ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

This matter has been considered on appel-lee’s motion for clarification. This court’s opinion of December 8, 1981, 406 So.2d 1240 (Fla.App.), is clarified as follows. The final judgment as it relates to dissolution of marriage, child custody, distribution of home furnishings, attorney’s fee, and restraining the parties from molesting, harming, har-anging, assaulting and harassing the other is affirmed. These matters were not raised as error by appellant. As indicated in a prior opinion herein, the final judgment is reversed inasmuch as it grants relief not specifically pleaded. Other than as indicated above, all requests for rehearing and clarification are denied.

McCORD and SHIVERS, JJ., concur. BOOTH, J., dissents with written opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nalley v. Nalley, 411 So. 2d 275, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19452 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

411 So. 2d 275 (Nalley v. Nalley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nalley v. Nalley
406 So. 2d 1240 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)