Nall v. State

230 So. 3d 1279
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 7, 2017
DocketCASE NO. 1D17-0770
StatusPublished

This text of 230 So. 3d 1279 (Nall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nall v. State, 230 So. 3d 1279 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

WOLF, J.

In this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we find no reversible error. Therefore, we AFFIRM appellant’s judgment and sentence. However, we REMAND for the trial court to correct a scrivener’s error in the order revoking community control; the order indicates appellant admitted to violating his community control when, in fact, appellant was found to have violated his community control after an evidentiary hearing. See Nickolas v. State, 66 So.3d 1077, 1077 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and WINOKUR, J., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Nickolas v. State
66 So. 3d 1077 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
230 So. 3d 1279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nall-v-state-fladistctapp-2017.