Nall v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Nall v. State

230 So. 3d 1279

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 7, 2017·No. CASE NO. 1D17-0770·Published

Opinion

WOLF, J.

In this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we find no reversible error. Therefore, we AFFIRM appellant’s judgment and sentence. However, we REMAND for the trial court to correct a scrivener’s error in the order revoking community control; the order indicates appellant admitted to violating his community control when, in fact, appellant was found to have violated his community control after an evidentiary hearing. See Nickolas v. State, 66 So.3d 1077, 1077 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and WINOKUR, J., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WOLF, J.

In this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we find no reversible error. Therefore, we AFFIRM appellant’s judgment and sentence. However, we REMAND for the trial court to correct a scrivener’s error in the order revoking community control; the order indicates appellant admitted to violating his community control when, in fact, appellant was found to have violated his community control after an evidentiary hearing. See Nickolas v. State, 66 So.3d 1077, 1077 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and WINOKUR, J., CONCUR.

Nall v. State, 230 So. 3d 1279 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

230 So. 3d 1279 (Nall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related