Nale v. Montgomery

813 So. 2d 67, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 221, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 388, 2002 WL 349919
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 7, 2002·No. No. SC00-2487·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We granted review of Nale v. Montgomery, 768 So.2d 1166 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), based on apparent conflict with Silvestrone v. Edell, 721 So.2d 1173 (Fla.1998). See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon closer examination, however, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted in this case. Therefore, we dismiss review of this cause.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur. HARDING, J., dissents with an opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nale v. Montgomery, 813 So. 2d 67, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 221, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 388, 2002 WL 349919 (Fla. 2002).

813 So. 2d 67 (Nale v. Montgomery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Silvestrone v. Edell
721 So. 2d 1173 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)
Blumberg v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co.
790 So. 2d 1061 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)
Nale v. Montgomery
768 So. 2d 1166 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)