Nalder

Court of Claims

Nalder

650 F.2d 285, 222 Ct. Cl. 616, 1980 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 41

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedFebruary 8, 1980

DocketNo. 172-77

StatusPublished

This text of 650 F.2d 285 (Nalder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nalder, 650 F.2d 285, 222 Ct. Cl. 616, 1980 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 41 (cc 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

Eminent domain; taking. — In an order of June 22, 1978, 217 Ct. Cl. 686, the court denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment and remanded the case to the trial division for further proceedings. On February 8, 1980 the court entered the following order:

Before Davis, Judge, Presiding, Kunzig and Bennett, Judges.

This case comes before the court on a Memorandum Report for Judgment filed by the trial judge on December 11, 1979, in which it is stated that defendant’s motion to dismiss under Rule 102(c)(1) was allowed at trial in open [617]*617court after conclusion of plaintiffs’ case-in-chief, and that said motion was unopposed by plaintiffs.

it is therefore ordered that plaintiffs’ amended petition be and is hereby dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eminent domain; taking. — In an order of June 22, 1978, 217 Ct. Cl. 686, the court denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment and remanded the case to the trial division for further proceedings. On February 8, 1980 the court entered the following order:

Before Davis, Judge, Presiding, Kunzig and Bennett, Judges.

This case comes before the court on a Memorandum Report for Judgment filed by the trial judge on December 11, 1979, in which it is stated that defendant’s motion to dismiss under Rule 102(c)(1) was allowed at trial in open [617]*617court after conclusion of plaintiffs’ case-in-chief, and that said motion was unopposed by plaintiffs.

it is therefore ordered that plaintiffs’ amended petition be and is hereby dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

650 F.2d 285, 222 Ct. Cl. 616, 1980 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 41, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nalder-cc-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack