Nalbandian v. PROGRESSIVE MICHIGAN INSURANCE COMPANY
708 N.W.2d 382, 474 Mich. 1019
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided January 27, 2006·No. Docket Nos. 129200-01 & (53), COA Nos. 252164, 254317·Published
Opinion
Anthony NALBANDIAN, on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated persons, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee,
v.
PROGRESSIVE MICHIGAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant.
Steve S. George, on behalf of himself and all similarly situated persons, Plaintiff-Appellant, and
Auto Club Insurance Company and Auto Club Insurance Association, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 21, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant are considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nalbandian v. PROGRESSIVE MICHIGAN INSURANCE COMPANY, 708 N.W.2d 382, 474 Mich. 1019 (Mich. 2006).
708 N.W.2d 382 (Nalbandian v. PROGRESSIVE MICHIGAN INSURANCE COMPANY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.