Nakia Garrus v. Secretary Pa Dept Corr

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided February 24, 2012·No. 09-3586·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 09-3586

NAKIA WILLIAM GARRUS,

Appellant

v.

*SECRETARY OF THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;

THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA;

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA

*(Pursuant to Rule 43(c), Fed. R. App. P.)

PRESENT: McKEE, Chief Judge, SLOVITER, SCIRICA, RENDELL, AMBRO, FUENTES, SMITH, FISHER, CHAGARES, JORDAN, HARDIMAN, GREENAWAY, JR. and VANASKIE, Circuit Judges

ORDER

The Court, sua sponte, orders rehearing en banc in the above captioned case. It is

ordered that the Clerk of this Court list the case for rehearing en banc Wednesday, May 30, 2012 at 10:00 am.

The en banc court will consider whether the district court erred in considering the defendant’s 1997 conviction for second-degree burglary in determining whether the defendant should be sentenced under Pennsylvania’s “three strikes” law, 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9714.

The Clerk of Court will set an appropriate briefing schedule..

By the Court,

Theodore A. McKee

Chief Circuit Judge

Dated: February 24, 2012 SLC/cc: Thomas W. Dolgenos David R. Fine

David C. Glebe

Anthony R. Holtzman

Robert M. Wolff

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nakia Garrus v. Secretary Pa Dept Corr, (3d Cir. 2012).

Nakia Garrus v. Secretary Pa Dept Corr (Nakia Garrus v. Secretary Pa Dept Corr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 9714
Pennsylvania § 9714
§ 9714
Pennsylvania 42 § 9714