Nakagawa v. Highway Farming Company

California Court of Appeal

Nakagawa v. Highway Farming Company

245 P. 435, 76 Cal. App. 800, 1926 Cal. App. LEXIS 469

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedFebruary 19, 1926

DocketDocket No. 3075.

StatusPublished

This text of 245 P. 435 (Nakagawa v. Highway Farming Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nakagawa v. Highway Farming Company, 245 P. 435, 76 Cal. App. 800, 1926 Cal. App. LEXIS 469 (Cal. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant Highway Farming Company has appealed from the judgment herein in favor of plaintiffs against that company and in favor of defendants Ardzrooni Bros. against the plaintiffs. The appeal is submitted upon the briefs and oral arguments in the case of Tanaka and others against the same defendants (ante, p. 590 [245 P. 434]). But one point is made by the appellant, and that the same as made in the Tanaka case, and the facts material to the appeals are the same in both cases.

[1] For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the Tanaka case, the judgment is affirmed.

Pullen, J., pro tem., and Plummer, J., concurred.

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant Highway Farming Company has appealed from the judgment herein in favor of plaintiffs against that company and in favor of defendants Ardzrooni Bros. against the plaintiffs. The appeal is submitted upon the briefs and oral arguments in the case of Tanaka and others against the same defendants (ante, p. 590 [245 P. 434]). But one point is made by the appellant, and that the same as made in the Tanaka case, and the facts material to the appeals are the same in both cases.

[1] For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the Tanaka case, the judgment is affirmed.

Pullen, J., pro tem., and Plummer, J., concurred.

*Page 1

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 P. 435, 76 Cal. App. 800, 1926 Cal. App. LEXIS 469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nakagawa-v-highway-farming-company-calctapp-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack