Nakagawa v. Highway Farming Co.

California Court of Appeal

Nakagawa v. Highway Farming Co.

76 Cal. App. 800

California Court of Appeal·Decided February 19, 1926·No. Civ. No. 3075·Published

Opinion

FINCH, P. J.

The defendant Highway Farming Company has appealed from the judgment herein in favor of plaintiffs against that company and in favor of defendants Ardzrooni Bros, against the plaintiffs. The appeal is submitted upon the briefs and oral arguments in the case of Tanaka and others against the same defendants (ante, p. 590 [245 Pac. 434]). But one point is made by the appellant, and that the same as made in the Tanaka case, and the facts material to the appeals are the same in both cases.

For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the Tanaka case, the judgment is affirmed.

Pullen, J., pro tem., and Plummer, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FINCH, P. J.

The defendant Highway Farming Company has appealed from the judgment herein in favor of plaintiffs against that company and in favor of defendants Ardzrooni Bros, against the plaintiffs. The appeal is submitted upon the briefs and oral arguments in the case of Tanaka and others against the same defendants (ante, p. 590 [245 Pac. 434]). But one point is made by the appellant, and that the same as made in the Tanaka case, and the facts material to the appeals are the same in both cases.

For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the Tanaka case, the judgment is affirmed.

Pullen, J., pro tem., and Plummer, J., concurred.

Nakagawa v. Highway Farming Co., 76 Cal. App. 800 (Cal. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

76 Cal. App. 800 (Nakagawa v. Highway Farming Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related