Nakagawa v. Highway Farming Co.

76 Cal. App. 800
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedFebruary 19, 1926
DocketCiv. No. 3075
StatusPublished

This text of 76 Cal. App. 800 (Nakagawa v. Highway Farming Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nakagawa v. Highway Farming Co., 76 Cal. App. 800 (Cal. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

FINCH, P. J.

The defendant Highway Farming Company has appealed from the judgment herein in favor of plaintiffs against that company and in favor of defendants Ardzrooni Bros, against the plaintiffs. The appeal is submitted upon the briefs and oral arguments in the case of Tanaka and others against the same defendants (ante, p. 590 [245 Pac. 434]). But one point is made by the appellant, and that the same as made in the Tanaka case, and the facts material to the appeals are the same in both cases.

For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the Tanaka case, the judgment is affirmed.

Pullen, J., pro tem., and Plummer, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tanaka v. Highway Farming Co.
245 P. 434 (California Court of Appeal, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 Cal. App. 800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nakagawa-v-highway-farming-co-calctapp-1926.