Najjar v. Najjar

116 N.E. 808, 227 Mass. 450, 1917 Mass. LEXIS 1134
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedJune 26, 1917
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 116 N.E. 808 (Najjar v. Najjar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Najjar v. Najjar, 116 N.E. 808, 227 Mass. 450, 1917 Mass. LEXIS 1134 (Mass. 1917).

Opinion

Pierce, J.

November 13, 1913, the libellant filed a libel for divorce which alleged as ground for divorce cruel and abusive treatment and that the libellee, being of sufficient ability, grossly or wantonly and cruelly refused and neglected to provide a suitable maintenance for the libellant. On this libel no service was ever made on the libellee and no action was taken after the filing of the libel other than the issuance of an order of notice.

On July 22, 1916, the libellant filed a libel on the ground of desertion. There was personal service and the case when tried was uncontested. The evidence disclosed a desertion by the libellee on January 15, 1911, which has continued up to the date of the trial, October 26, 1916.

The only question presented is whether an overt act of filing a libel on the ground of cruel and abusive treatment and of gross, wanton and cruel refusal and neglect to provide suitable maintenance raises a conclusive presumption of fact that the continuance of the desertion after the filing of the libel is with and not without the consent of the party deserted. We think such an act does show necessarily a legal intention not to live with the libellee. Ford v. Ford, 143 Mass. 577.

The entry must be, libel dismissed.

Decree accordingly*

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commerce & Industry Insurance v. City of Toledo
543 N.E.2d 1188 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1989)
Miranda v. Miranda
215 N.E.2d 669 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1966)
Meyer v. Meyer
139 N.E.2d 709 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1957)
Strecker v. Barnard
240 P.2d 345 (California Court of Appeal, 1952)
Delgreco v. Delgreco
79 N.E.2d 185 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1948)
Rubinstein v. Rubinstein
66 N.E.2d 793 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1946)
Craskin v. Craskin
192 N.E. 314 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1934)
Espinola v. Espinola
173 N.E. 926 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1930)
Sherry v. Moore
155 N.E. 441 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1927)
Gerrish v. Gerrish
249 Mass. 219 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1924)
Moody v. Eggert Moody
108 A. 849 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 N.E. 808, 227 Mass. 450, 1917 Mass. LEXIS 1134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/najjar-v-najjar-mass-1917.