Najjar v. Horovitz

12 R.I. Dec. 133

Superior Court of Rhode Island·Decided April 4, 1935·No. Law No. 89756·Published

Opinion

CURRAN, J.

Heard on plaintiff’s motion to assess costs after verdict in her favor for $750:

A motion for a new trial is pending in this case and it seems to the Court that the motion to assess costs at this stage is premature. The motion should be entertained only after it is certain that judgment is to be entered for the plaintiff or after the entry of such judgment.

For plaintiff: Morris Berick. For defendant: Frederick A. Jones, Selverston.

The motion is denied without prejudice to its renewal at the proper time.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CURRAN, J.

Heard on plaintiff’s motion to assess costs after verdict in her favor for $750:

For plaintiff: Morris Berick. For defendant: Frederick A. Jones, Selverston.

The motion is denied without prejudice to its renewal at the proper time.

Najjar v. Horovitz, 12 R.I. Dec. 133 (R.I. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

12 R.I. Dec. 133 (Najjar v. Horovitz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.