Najib Hasim Munir v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 12, 2008
Docket04-08-00731-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Najib Hasim Munir v. State (Najib Hasim Munir v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Najib Hasim Munir v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00731-CR

Najib Hasim MUNIR, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2008-CR-1366 Honorable Bert Richardson, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Alma L. López, Chief Justice Catherine Stone, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 12, 2008

DISMISSED

Najib Munir pleaded nolo contendere to a felony pursuant to a plea bargain agreement. As

part of the plea bargain, Munir signed a waiver of his right to appeal. The trial court imposed

sentence in accordance with the agreement and signed a certificate stating that this “is a plea-bargain

case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(a)(2). Munir timely filed 04-08-00731-CR

a notice of appeal. The clerk’s record, which includes the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification

and a written plea bargain agreement, has been filed. See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d). This court must

dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been

made part of the record.” Id.

The court gave Munir notice that the appeal would be dismissed unless an amended trial

court certification showing he has the right to appeal were made part of the appellate record within

thirty days. See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d); 37.1; Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.–San

Antonio 2003, order), disp. on merits, No. 04-03-00176-CR, 2003 WL 21508347 (July 2, 2003, pet.

ref’d) (not designated for publication). Munir’s appointed appellate counsel filed a written response,

stating she has reviewed the record and can find no right of appeal. After reviewing the record and

counsel’s notice, we agree that Munir does not have a right to appeal. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d

610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of appeals should review clerk’s record to determine

whether trial court’s certification is accurate). We therefore dismiss this appeal. TEX . R. APP . P.

25.2(d).

Do not publish

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dears v. State
154 S.W.3d 610 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Daniels v. State
110 S.W.3d 174 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Najib Hasim Munir v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/najib-hasim-munir-v-state-texapp-2008.