Najar v. Arizona

Supreme Court

Najar v. Arizona

137 S. Ct. 369, 196 L. Ed. 2d 287

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 31, 2016

DocketNo. 15–8878.

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 137 S. Ct. 369 (Najar v. Arizona) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Najar v. Arizona, 137 S. Ct. 369, 196 L. Ed. 2d 287 (U.S. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

*370On petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One for further consideration in light of Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 718, 193 L.Ed.2d 599 (2016).

Justice SOTOMAYOR concurs in the decision to grant, vacate, and remand. See Tatum v. Arizona, 580 U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 11, --- L.E.2d ---- (2016) ( Sotomayor, J., concurring). Justice ALITO, with whom Justice THOMAS joins, dissents from the decision to grant, vacate, and remand. See Tatum v. Arizona, 580 U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 11, --- L.E.2d ---- (2016) (Alito, J., dissenting).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*370On petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One for further consideration in light of Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 718, 193 L.Ed.2d 599 (2016).

Justice SOTOMAYOR concurs in the decision to grant, vacate, and remand. See Tatum v. Arizona, 580 U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 11, --- L.E.2d ---- (2016) ( Sotomayor, J., concurring). Justice ALITO, with whom Justice THOMAS joins, dissents from the decision to grant, vacate, and remand. See Tatum v. Arizona, 580 U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 11, --- L.E.2d ---- (2016) (Alito, J., dissenting).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

137 S. Ct. 369, 196 L. Ed. 2d 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/najar-v-arizona-scotus-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack