Najafian v. Capital One N.A.
This text of 426 F. App'x 191 (Najafian v. Capital One N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
In these consolidated appeals, Fatemeh Najafian appeals the district court’s orders: (1) denying her motions to renew the automatic stay and prevent foreclosure; (2) affirming the bankruptcy court’s order granting Capital One N.A.’s motion for relief from the automatic stay; and (3) dismissing her motion to appeal an order of the bankruptcy court denying her motion to dismiss the Interim Trustee. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Najafian v. Capital One N.A., Nos. 1:10-cv-00664-GBL-IDD; 1-10-cv-00843-GBL-IDD (E.D. Va. Oct. 25, 2010; filed Nov. 15, 2010 & entered Nov. 16, 2010; filed Nov. 22, 2010 & entered Nov. 23, 2010). We deny Najafian’s motion for preparation of a transcript at government expense and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
426 F. App'x 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/najafian-v-capital-one-na-ca4-2011.