Naim v. Naim

Supreme Court

Naim v. Naim

350 U.S. 891, 76 S. Ct. 151, 100 L. Ed. 784, 1955 U.S. LEXIS 140

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedNovember 14, 1955

DocketNo. 366

StatusPublished

Cited by26 cases

This text of 350 U.S. 891 (Naim v. Naim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Naim v. Naim, 350 U.S. 891, 76 S. Ct. 151, 100 L. Ed. 784, 1955 U.S. LEXIS 140 (1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia.

Per Curiam:

The inadequacy of the record as to the relationship of the parties to the Commonwealth of Virginia at the time of the marriage in North Carolina and upon their return to Virginia, and the failure of the parties to bring here all questions relevant to the disposition of the case, prevents the constitutional issue of the validity of the Virginia statute on miscegenation tendered here being considered “in clean-cut and concrete form, unclouded” by such problems. Rescue Army v. Municipal Court, 331 U. S. 549, 584. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded to the Supreme Court of Appeals in order that the case may be returned to the Circuit Court of the City of Portsmouth for action not inconsistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia.

Per Curiam:

The inadequacy of the record as to the relationship of the parties to the Commonwealth of Virginia at the time of the marriage in North Carolina and upon their return to Virginia, and the failure of the parties to bring here all questions relevant to the disposition of the case, prevents the constitutional issue of the validity of the Virginia statute on miscegenation tendered here being considered “in clean-cut and concrete form, unclouded” by such problems. Rescue Army v. Municipal Court, 331 U. S. 549, 584. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded to the Supreme Court of Appeals in order that the case may be returned to the Circuit Court of the City of Portsmouth for action not inconsistent with this opinion.

Eugene L. Hunt v. Richard Roth, Sheriff of Douglas County, Nebraska and Joseph Vitek, Warden, Douglas County Corrections Center, and Director, Douglas County Department of Corrections, Eugene L. Hunt v. James M. Murphy, District Judge of the Fourth Judicial District of the State of Nebraska, Douglas County, Nebraska

648 F.2d 1148 (Fourth Circuit, 1981)

Hunt v. Roth

648 F.2d 1148 (Eighth Circuit, 1981)

LeBlanc v. Foti

487 F. Supp. 272 (E.D. Louisiana, 1980)

United States v. Scott Allen Noland

495 F.2d 529 (Fifth Circuit, 1974)

United States v. Noland

367 F. Supp. 571 (W.D. Texas, 1973)

United States v. Emanuel Clemons, United States of America v. Archie Blyther, Jr.

440 F.2d 205 (D.C. Circuit, 1970)

Schultz v. Hartin & Son

428 F.2d 186 (Fourth Circuit, 1970)

Schultz v. W. R. Hartin & Son, Inc.

428 F.2d 186 (Fourth Circuit, 1970)

Lawrence v. Blackwell

298 F. Supp. 708 (N.D. Georgia, 1969)

Alvey v. Hedin

221 A.2d 62 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1966)

Loving v. Commonwealth

147 S.E.2d 78 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1966)

United States v. Fance Bell

345 F.2d 354 (Seventh Circuit, 1965)

William Andrew Washington v. Donald Clemmer

339 F.2d 715 (D.C. Circuit, 1964)

Lawrence Allison Hobart v. United States

275 F.2d 941 (Ninth Circuit, 1960)

United States v. James Duhart

269 F.2d 113 (Second Circuit, 1959)

Jerry R. England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners

263 F.2d 661 (Fifth Circuit, 1959)

Whittle v. Board of Zoning Appeals

125 A.2d 41 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

350 U.S. 891, 76 S. Ct. 151, 100 L. Ed. 784, 1955 U.S. LEXIS 140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/naim-v-naim-scotus-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack