Naim Stewart v. State of Florida
This text of Naim Stewart v. State of Florida (Naim Stewart v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
Nos. 1D16-3644 1D16-3646 _____________________________
NAIM STEWART,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Gadsden County. Barbara K. Hobbs, Judge.
February 5, 2019
PER CURIAM.
In these Anders * appeals, we affirm the orders revoking Appellant’s probation and imposing sentence. However, we remand for correction of the written orders of revocation to specify the conditions Appellant was found to have violated. See Davis v. State, 218 So. 3d 507 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (affirming revocation of probation in Anders appeal but remanding for court to enter written revocation order specifying conditions of probation violated). Appellant need not be present. See Williams v. State, 145 So. 3d 984 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014).
* Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). AFFIRMED and REMANDED.
ROBERTS, WETHERELL, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Candice K. Brower, Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, Michael J. Titus, Assistant Regional Conflict Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Naim Stewart v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/naim-stewart-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2019.